1997
DOI: 10.1029/97ja00151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical relationships between high‐latitude ionospheric F region/topside upflows and their drivers: DE 2 observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
71
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Zheng et al [2005] found in a statistical survey of POLAR satellite data that outflowing ions were correlated with soft electron precipitation and to a slightly lesser degree, downward directed Poynting flux. The former finding is in agreement with Seo et al [1997] who identified the anticorrelation of precipitating electron energy and ion up flux at low DE-2 satellite (850 -950 km) altitudes. Ogawa et al [2003] used DMSP and EISCAT to show that soft precipitation primarily drives ion upflow.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Zheng et al [2005] found in a statistical survey of POLAR satellite data that outflowing ions were correlated with soft electron precipitation and to a slightly lesser degree, downward directed Poynting flux. The former finding is in agreement with Seo et al [1997] who identified the anticorrelation of precipitating electron energy and ion up flux at low DE-2 satellite (850 -950 km) altitudes. Ogawa et al [2003] used DMSP and EISCAT to show that soft precipitation primarily drives ion upflow.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Seo et al [1997] also found that for nearly constant precipitation energy flux for electrons of < 1 keV energies, the ion upflow velocities and fluxes increased as the characteristic precipitation energies decreased. They suggested that soft electron precipitation was probably the primary driver of these auroral ion upflows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The effects of •oft electron precipitation on F region/topside upflows were investigated with fluid modeling [Richards, 1995;Suet al, 1999] and semi-kinetic modeling [Brown et al, 1995a]. Satellite measurements [Seo et al, 1997] [Hedin, 1991] or international reference ionosphere-90 (IRI-90) hmF2-derived neutral wind models [Richards, 1991] To join the fluid and GSK treatments and regions, the injected GSK simulation ions are introduced into the bottom cell of the kinetic region, as generated from a drifting Maxwellian distribution constructed from the ion bulk parameters of densities, bulk field-aligned flow velocities, and temperatures at 800 km in the fluid region. In the following time step, the bulk parameters calculated from various moments at the 1100 km cell of the kinetic region and their gradients are passed back as the upper boundary condition to the fluid region.…”
Section: Paper Number 1999ja900114mentioning
confidence: 99%