Stimulating Students’ Argumentation using Drawing – based Modeling on The Concept of Ecosystem

Sumarni, E N; Widodo, Ari; Solihat, Rini

doi:10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16688

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this case, the physics phenomena in real-life were used as the argumentation trigger. This approach is also related to the findind of other researcher [15]. Some examples of this phenomenon are shown in Figure 2 (insects and surface tension), Figure 3 (on fluid and viscosity).…”

Section: Figure 1 Example Of the Problem Using Toulmin Argumentation ...mentioning

confidence: 79%

Online Student-worksheet Based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern in Physics Learning

Sulisworo

Safitri

2022

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research provides an online worksheet that can help improve students’ argumentative skills in learning physics. The media developed is based on Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern. The resulting product is an online worksheet that is valid and effective for use in physics learning. The development stage used a 4-D model. Validation was carried out by media experts and learning experts using a questionnaire. The validation questionnaire includes four aspects (Concept Accuracy, Clear Meaning, Physical Appearance, and Element Completeness). Besides, the media was also tested in small groups to determine the user’s response to four aspects (Language Clearness, Attractiveness Layout, Content Understandable, and Communication flow). The effectiveness of the media was measured using a pretest-posttest one group design and the gain score. The argumentation skills test was in the form of ten essay questions. The student answer using TAP components. This study’s results indicate that this online worksheet is valid and effective in encouraging the development of students’ argumentative skills. Three essencial characteristics of the worksheet encouraging the skills are using issues related to daily-life, various media types, and providing many activities.

show abstract

Section: Figure 1 Example Of the Problem Using Toulmin Argumentation ...mentioning

confidence: 79%

Online Student-worksheet Based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern in Physics Learning

Sulisworo

Safitri

2022

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although findings from learning progression areas provide a clear distinction on how students learn food webs and progress throughout their educational years, many researchers studied how appropriate instructional strategies could aid students in seeing more sophisticated relationships in an ecosystem (e.g., Grotzer & Bell, 2003; Lehrer & Schauble, 2012; Nguyen & Santagata, 2021). Notably, Sumarni et al (2017) compared the business‐as‐usual condition to a paper‐based drawing modeling condition and examined the impacts on students' argumentation skills within the food webs unit. The authors found that students in the latter condition produced more coherent arguments (data, warrant, and backing) and had higher increases in their conceptual understanding of food webs.…”

Section: Conceptual Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building a computational model of food webs: Impacts on middle school students' computational and systems thinking skills

Rachmatullah

Wiebe

2021

J Res Sci Teach

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integral to fostering computational thinking (CT) skills, which are increasingly essential in today's digital era, has been the shift of paper‐based pictorial modeling activities to computational modeling. Research has indicated that modeling activities can advance students' understanding of a system's mechanism (i.e., systems thinking), such as an ecosystem. The current study examines the impacts of paper‐based pictorial and computational modeling activities on students' systems thinking and CT skills. A total of 751 seventh‐grade students were involved in online modeling activities, spanning over 4 days, and were assigned purposefully to a paper‐based modeling condition (n = 374) or a computational modeling (n = 377) condition. They took systems‐thinking‐embedded food web and CT assessments before and after the four activities, in addition to a formative assessment after each activity. Multilevel modeling and repeated‐measures correlation tests were used to analyze the students' quantitative data. Epistemic network analysis (ENA) was utilized to map out students' perceptions of what they believed they learned from the activities. The results revealed significant increases in the systems thinking‐embedded food web constructs in both conditions. However, the increase of CT skills in the paper‐based pictorial condition was not as significant as the increase in the computational modeling condition. ENA results showed that students in the computational modeling condition had more co‐occurrences between science and computer science or CT concepts than those in the paper‐based pictorial condition. These findings illuminate the benefit of engaging students in computationally rich science activities to advance both systems thinking and CT skills.

show abstract

“…Keterampialan argumentasi akan dikembangkan bersama dengan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Keterampilan argumentasi adalah bagian dari pengembangan berpikir tingkat tinggi yang digunakan untuk menganalisis informasi mengenai suatu topik yang nantinya hasil dari analisis akan dikomunikasikan kepada orang lain (Sumarni, et al 2017).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berpola Claim, Data, Warrant (Cdw) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa

Rahayu

Effendi²

2020

BIOEDUSAINS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to develop student worksheets (LKPD) patterned claim, data, warrant (CDW) on human respiratory system material and find out how teachers respond and student responses and the effect of using LKPD on student argumentation ability. The development model used in this research is addie development model consisting of 5 stages, namely analysis, planning, development, implementation and evaluation. The development of this LKPD uses due diligence based on expert validation of materials and validation of media experts, as well as teacher response and student response. Data analysis techniques used are qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The results of both validators state that LKPD is worthy of testing. Furthermore, the results of the teacher's response also stated that the LKPD is feasible in the trial with a score of 93%. Then the results of the odd and even group student response were obtained from kappa test of 0.673 with high category and correlation test of 0.806 with very strong category. This means that the two groups of students have been in touch and agreed to state that LKPD is worthy of trial. In conclusion, students can understand the problem of claims, data, warrant (CDW) arguments judging by the score of the paired sample t test of 0.000 which means that there is an influence of the use of student worksheets (LKPD) on students' argumentation ability. Keywords: Claim, Data, Warrant (CDW), Student Worksheet (LKPD), Argumentation Ability.

show abstract

Stimulating Students’ Argumentation using Drawing – based Modeling on The Concept of Ecosystem

Cited by 7 publications

References 4 publications

Online Student-worksheet Based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern in Physics Learning

Online Student-worksheet Based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern in Physics Learning

Building a computational model of food webs: Impacts on middle school students' computational and systems thinking skills

Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berpola Claim, Data, Warrant (Cdw) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About