2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2014732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stitching for a large area of surface topography analysis of diamond grinding wheel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two approaches use different techniques. There are various sources of measurement errors after applications of these methods [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. They were utilized to prove that our approach can be used independently of measurement methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two approaches use different techniques. There are various sources of measurement errors after applications of these methods [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. They were utilized to prove that our approach can be used independently of measurement methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-measured points are surface locations for which no valid measured values occur. The application of stitching is an additional source of measurement error [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface microtopographies of each sample were measured in order to obtain detailed views (a small surface area: ≤1.5×1.5 mm), as well as to obtain a view of the surface in a more general (wide) view. In this case, a large surface area (≥2.0×2.0 mm) was registered using an image stitching procedure [34]. The measurement time for individual samples depended on the type of surface and its specific Brought to you by | MIT Libraries Authenticated Download Date | 5/12/18 1:11 PM characteristics, as well as the registration parameters adopted for the instrument.…”
Section: B Measurement Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other errors are related to stylus flight—the possibility of losing contact between stylus tip and surface texture, when the measurement speed is too high [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. The errors typical of using optical methods are related to the presence of non-measured points [ 12 ] or spikes [ 13 , 14 ], stitching can be another source of errors [ 15 , 16 ]. High-frequency noise can also cause errors of surface topography measurement using optical and tactile methods [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%