2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-2869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Aircraft Optimization and Decision Making using a Competitive Value-Driven Design Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method employs a sequential Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to generate random samples (or trajectories) of component performance based on adverse condition-dependent degradation rates and restoration models. Similarly, Desai and Hollingsworth (2018) show that by using second-order stochastic dominance it is possible to reduce the risk of incorrect decisions being taken due to the risk aversion of the engineering team. Wang and Kannah (2017) goes a step further in their attempt to quantify uncertainty by borrowing the Gini Coefficient from the field of economics to measure the inequality among values of a frequency distribution.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Uncertainty Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method employs a sequential Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to generate random samples (or trajectories) of component performance based on adverse condition-dependent degradation rates and restoration models. Similarly, Desai and Hollingsworth (2018) show that by using second-order stochastic dominance it is possible to reduce the risk of incorrect decisions being taken due to the risk aversion of the engineering team. Wang and Kannah (2017) goes a step further in their attempt to quantify uncertainty by borrowing the Gini Coefficient from the field of economics to measure the inequality among values of a frequency distribution.…”
Section: The Emergence Of Uncertainty Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, Jimenez and Mavris [12] determine Pareto-optimal solutions, which are the set of technologies that lie on a Pareto front of the objectives. A similar approach [13] uses stochastic dominance to remove design alternatives (i.e., technology portfolios) from the complete set, leaving decision makers with only optimal alternatives, to reduce the risk of incorrect decisions. While these approaches do retain the full information of the CDFs, it becomes harder to rank the technologies because crossing CDFs do not exhibit stochastic dominance and subjective judgment is needed to prefer one solution over another.…”
Section: Selecting Technologies In Aircraft Conceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 13. Probability density functions for 2nd DOF flap technology with original (blue) distributions and for a 15% PRE −1 reduction (red, dashed).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%