2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.61.124015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic background of gravitational waves

Abstract: A continuous stochastic background of gravitational waves (GWs) for burst sources is produced if the mean time interval between the occurrence of bursts is smaller than the average time duration of a single burst at the emission, i.e., the so called duty cycle must be greater than one. To evaluate the background of GWs produced by an ensemble of sources, during their formation, for example, one needs to know the average energy flux emitted during the formation of a single object and the formation rate of such … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the full three-dimensional simulations that include all relevant processes are yet to be made, predictions have already been made about the gravitationalwave signals emitted during core collapse [62][63][64]. These predictions have then been used to make estimates of the corresponding SGWB due to both standard and early (population III) stars [41,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. These estimates are necessarily only approximate, both because it is currently not well understood how the gravitational-wave signal depends on the progenitor stellar parameters such as the mass or spin, and because the rate of core collapse events is uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the full three-dimensional simulations that include all relevant processes are yet to be made, predictions have already been made about the gravitationalwave signals emitted during core collapse [62][63][64]. These predictions have then been used to make estimates of the corresponding SGWB due to both standard and early (population III) stars [41,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. These estimates are necessarily only approximate, both because it is currently not well understood how the gravitational-wave signal depends on the progenitor stellar parameters such as the mass or spin, and because the rate of core collapse events is uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further details we refer the reader to, e.g., [5]. It is worth mentioning that concerning the star formation at high redshift, the IMF could be biased toward high-mass stars, when compared to the solar neighborhood IMF, as a result of the absence of metals [6,7].…”
Section: Initial Mass Function and The Neutron Star Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see [11,12]). The micro-collapse produces GWs at frequency ν of the NS f-mode, and dimensionless amplitude given by [13] h N S ≃ 1 × 10…”
Section: Gravitational Wave Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]). Some authors argue that there is an additional (1 + z) term in the equation for the differential rate dividinġ ρ ⋆ (z), which would take into account the effect of cosmic expansion onto the time variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group does not include this factor dividing the SFRD (see, e.g., Refs. [1,2,3]). On the other hand, the second group argues that it is necessary to include the factor (1 + z) to account for the time dilation of the observed rate by cosmic expansion, converting a source-count equation to an event-rate equation (see, e.g., Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%