2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0001867800004122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic ordering of classical discrete distributions

Abstract: For several pairs (P, Q) of classical distributions on N 0 , we show that their stochastic ordering P ≤ st Q can be characterized by their extreme tail ordering equivalent to P ({k * })/Q({k * }) ≥ 1 ≥ lim k→k * P ({k})/Q({k}), with k * and k * denoting the minimum and the supremum of the support of P + Q, and with the limit to be read as P ({k * })/Q({k * }) for k * finite. This includes in particular all pairs where P and Q are both binomial (b n1,p1 ≤ st b n2,p2 if and only if n 1 ≤ n 2 and (1 − p 1 ) n1 ≥ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. This is a well known result (see [2,7]). We include some details of the proof for the sake of completeness.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11supporting
confidence: 54%
“…Proof. This is a well known result (see [2,7]). We include some details of the proof for the sake of completeness.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11supporting
confidence: 54%
“…So, from (6) and (7), we can conclude that only the left-hand side of (5) is bounded from above by something greater than 1 − δ and, hence, (4) need not imply (5). Therefore, some pursuit learning specific considerations are needed and, to the authors' knowledge, there is no obvious way to fill this gap.…”
Section: Existing Proofs Of ε-Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The proof in [15] implicitly assumes that (4) implies (5). A slightly different oversight is made in [7], [12], and [19].…”
Section: Existing Proofs Of ε-Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, note that D h and D h+1 are (shifted) binomial random variables and satisfy the conditions of Theorem (1.a) in Klenke and Mattner (2010), which implies that D h+1 ≤ st D h or that for all nondecreasing functions γ :…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%