1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00121682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic programming approaches to stochastic scheduling

Abstract: Practical scheduling problems typically require decisions without full information about the outcomes of those decisions. Yields, resource availability, performance, demand, costs, and revenues may all vary. Incorporating these quantities into stochastic scheduling models often produces difficulties in analysis that may be addressed in a variety of ways. In thii paper, we present results based on stochastic programming approaches to the hierarchy of decisions in typical stochastic scheduling situations. Our un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These linear models are more aggregate than the integer-constrained shift scheduling models we consider here. For stochastic programming approaches to hierarchical scheduling, see Birge and Dempster (1996).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These linear models are more aggregate than the integer-constrained shift scheduling models we consider here. For stochastic programming approaches to hierarchical scheduling, see Birge and Dempster (1996).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are shown in Fig. 1 and denoted by (1), (2), (3) and (4). The probability of occurrence of each of these scenarios is 0.25, which is obtained by multiplying the probabilities of the uncertain parameter values in each scenario.…”
Section: Approximation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an abundance of literature in the area of optimization under uncertainty involving several applications. Some of these include: production planning (Clay and Grossmann, 1997;Cheng et al, 2003), scheduling (Birge and Dempster, 1996; Balasubramanian and Grossmann, 2002), optimal chemical process synthesis (Acevedo and Pistikopoulos, 1998;Liu and Sahinidis, 1996;Rooney and Biegler, 2003), electricity production (Takriti et al, 1996;Nowak et al, 2005). Usually problems with uncertainty are represented as stochastic programming problems (Birge and Louveaux, 1997) or as deterministic flexibility problems (Grossmann et al, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some relevant research on duality gaps in stochastic programming is contained in [5,30,31]. The authors of [5,31] try to establish quantitative estimates for the duality gap arising when the scenario decomposition approach is applied to solving mixed-integer multistage stochastic programs. The relative duality gap per scenario term is estimated in [31].…”
Section: A T T (ζ T )X T + a T T−1 (ζ T )X T−1 ≥ C T (ζ T )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative duality gap per scenario term is estimated in [31]. In [5] the authors state sufficient conditions that lead to the vanishing of the duality gap in the scenario decomposition if the number of scenarios tends to infinity. However, an example with non-vanishing duality gap while increasing the number of scenarios is constructed in [30].…”
Section: A T T (ζ T )X T + a T T−1 (ζ T )X T−1 ≥ C T (ζ T )mentioning
confidence: 99%