1986
DOI: 10.1002/9781118782088.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology From Theory to Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from Table and equation that in 3‐D, B c ≃1.5. It has been shown (Balberg & Binenbaum, ; Gelhar, ) that the connectivity exponents β , β b , ν , σ , and τ are equal for discrete and continuous systems.…”
Section: Percolation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear from Table and equation that in 3‐D, B c ≃1.5. It has been shown (Balberg & Binenbaum, ; Gelhar, ) that the connectivity exponents β , β b , ν , σ , and τ are equal for discrete and continuous systems.…”
Section: Percolation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After quantifying the likelihood that flow is controlled by a particular percolation cluster, it is also possible to understand directly the topology of the flow paths through the clusters that dominate solute transport at an arbitrary length scale, linking the subjects of hydraulic conductivity distributions and solute transport. It has long been recognized that the distributions of the hydraulic conductivity must be relevant to solute transport (Dagan, ; Freeze, ; Gelhar & Axness, ; Gelhar, ), but the actual solute transport paths through the regions of spatially variable hydraulic conductivity must control the distribution of the solute arrival times, and it is the connectivity of the paths that is critical to the form of such distributions.…”
Section: Percolation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accurate PTFs to estimate the complete hydraulic conductivity curve described by MvG used the estimated saturated hydraulic conductivity rather than the measured one and an estimated tortuosity parameter, L , rather than the standard value of 0.5 proposed by Mualem (). The reason for the preference for estimated values of hydraulic conductivity over measured ones in general is the inherent scale dependency of this parameter (Gelhar, ; Roth, ). The value for hydraulic conductivity is dependent upon the pore geometry at the scale of interest (Nieman & Rovey, ; Sánchez‐Vila et al, ; Schulze‐Makuch et al, ) and may show atmospheric dependence (Oosterwoud et al, ) seasonal effects (Suwardji & Eberbach, ; Farkas et al, ; Borman & Klaasen, ), and its quantification methods can produce as much variation as the other mentioned factors (Fodor et al, ).…”
Section: Ptfs In Earth System Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Chesapeake Bay restoration scientists seek to understand how the spatial arrangement of riparian buffers impacts the delivery of nutrients from agricultural fields to streams (Baker et al 2006). On the other hand, hydrogeology has a rich history of predicting spatially averaged fluxes from patch area and connectivity using an upscaled, effective permeability, k eff (Gelhar 1986, de Dreuzy et al 2010) that is constructed as a power-law area-weighted average of the permeability k i of the different patch types (Ronayne and Gorelick 2006): However, little consensus about how to quantify functional connectivity for surfacewater applications has emerged.…”
Section: Information Content Of Connectivity-orientation Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%