2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2011.5980280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STOMP: Stochastic trajectory optimization for motion planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
549
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 742 publications
(551 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
549
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our first contribution is to generate legible motion via functional gradient optimization in the space of trajectories (Sec. IV), echoing earlier works in motion planning [9,21,22,27,29,33,35], now with legibility as an optimization criterion. Fig.1 depicts this optimization process: by exaggerating the motion to the right, the robot makes the other goal option, G O , far less likely to be inferred by the observer that the correct goal G R .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our first contribution is to generate legible motion via functional gradient optimization in the space of trajectories (Sec. IV), echoing earlier works in motion planning [9,21,22,27,29,33,35], now with legibility as an optimization criterion. Fig.1 depicts this optimization process: by exaggerating the motion to the right, the robot makes the other goal option, G O , far less likely to be inferred by the observer that the correct goal G R .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While efficient trajectory optimization techniques do exist for high-dimensional spaces and non-convex costs [30], they are subject to local minima, and how to alleviate this issue in practice remains an open research question [31], [32]. Fig.…”
Section: B Evaluating and Generating Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…", to "I know how to make you believe I am grasping this". We do so via functional gradient optimization in the space of motion trajectories, echoing earlier works in motion planning [9,28,31,43,45,53,55,61], now with optimization criteria based on the observer's inferences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While trajectory optimization and recent methods for motion planning based on trajectory optimization (Ratliff, Zucker, Bagnell, & Srinivasa, 2009;Kalakrishnan et al, 2011) have been widely accepted in robotics, their focus is to optimally achieve a goal while satisfying task constraints such as obstacle avoidance and joint/torque limits. Different from imitation learning based methods, trajectory optimization does not exploit a prior of human demonstrations and does not address action recognition.…”
Section: Interaction Promps and Trajectory Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cited work, the intrinsic correlation of the movements of different agents are not exploited while here, the inference of the robot trajectory and the recognition of the human action are parametrically correlated. As a result, in the work of Mainprice & Berenson, an independent motion planning procedure-using STOMP (Kalakrishnan et al, 2011)-had to be used specifically to generate the robot trajectories once the intent of the human was recognized.…”
Section: Hybrid Approaches For Action Recognition and Robot Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%