Practicing Ethnography in Law 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-06573-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stories from the Field: Collecting Data Outside Over There

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by a long tradition of ethnographic courtroom work (e.g., Clair, 2020; Conley & O'Barr, 1990; Walenta, 2020) we investigated why cases ended up in the magistrates' courts, and how people made sense of the courts as a space, a process, and an actor in the broader “life of the dispute” (Griffiths, 1998; Weeks, 2013). As such, we triangulated observations, interviews, and textual analysis of court documents to build an in‐depth understanding of the role and appeal of the law and courts in a context where people are stereotypically cast as “law avoiders” (Kritzer, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by a long tradition of ethnographic courtroom work (e.g., Clair, 2020; Conley & O'Barr, 1990; Walenta, 2020) we investigated why cases ended up in the magistrates' courts, and how people made sense of the courts as a space, a process, and an actor in the broader “life of the dispute” (Griffiths, 1998; Weeks, 2013). As such, we triangulated observations, interviews, and textual analysis of court documents to build an in‐depth understanding of the role and appeal of the law and courts in a context where people are stereotypically cast as “law avoiders” (Kritzer, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participant observation, the method most associated with fieldwork, has always been combined with interviewing. But as Kritzer (2002) has pointed out, interviews and observations do not produce the same level of detail or even generate the same picture of the practices under study. Interviews are likely to generate less information about context than observation can because direct questions can only elicit what at some level the researcher already knows to be important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%