2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STR allelic frequencies for an African population sample (Equatorial Guinea) using AmpFlSTR Identifiler and Powerplex 16 kits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing allele frequency data from São Tomé e Príncipe to other 4 African continental mainland populations from Cabinda (Beleza et al, 2004), Mozambique , Equatorial Guinea (Alves et al, 2005) and Republic of Guinea-Bissau (Gonçalves et al, 2002) several significant differences were found (exact P<0.05) but applying the Bonferroni correction (SISA) the significance level lowered to 0.0127 and significant values were only found with Mozambique at loci TH01 (exact P=0.007±0.001) and TPOX (exact P=0.000±0.000), and with Guinea-Bissau at loci TH01 (exact P=0.000), which seems to reflect the colonization history of São Tomé e Príncipe that received most part of slaves from the West African coast neighboring the archipelago. A neighbor-joining tree was constructed based upon the 6 STR allele frequencies in our sampled population and from populations from Central Portugal (Manco et al, 2007(Manco et al, /2008, North Portugal (Pinheiro et al, 2005), Madeira , Azores (Velosa et al, 2002), Cabinda (Beleza et al, 2004), Mozambique , Equatorial Guinea (Alves et al, 2005) and Guinea-Bissau (Gonçalves et al, 2002) (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When comparing allele frequency data from São Tomé e Príncipe to other 4 African continental mainland populations from Cabinda (Beleza et al, 2004), Mozambique , Equatorial Guinea (Alves et al, 2005) and Republic of Guinea-Bissau (Gonçalves et al, 2002) several significant differences were found (exact P<0.05) but applying the Bonferroni correction (SISA) the significance level lowered to 0.0127 and significant values were only found with Mozambique at loci TH01 (exact P=0.007±0.001) and TPOX (exact P=0.000±0.000), and with Guinea-Bissau at loci TH01 (exact P=0.000), which seems to reflect the colonization history of São Tomé e Príncipe that received most part of slaves from the West African coast neighboring the archipelago. A neighbor-joining tree was constructed based upon the 6 STR allele frequencies in our sampled population and from populations from Central Portugal (Manco et al, 2007(Manco et al, /2008, North Portugal (Pinheiro et al, 2005), Madeira , Azores (Velosa et al, 2002), Cabinda (Beleza et al, 2004), Mozambique , Equatorial Guinea (Alves et al, 2005) and Guinea-Bissau (Gonçalves et al, 2002) (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A neighbor-joining tree was constructed based upon the 6 STR allele frequencies in our sampled population and from populations from Central Portugal (Manco et al, 2007(Manco et al, /2008, North Portugal (Pinheiro et al, 2005), Madeira , Azores (Velosa et al, 2002), Cabinda (Beleza et al, 2004), Mozambique , Equatorial Guinea (Alves et al, 2005) and Guinea-Bissau (Gonçalves et al, 2002) (Figure 1). Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other remarks: Little information is available on the allele frequencies of STRs in African populations when compared to Caucasian populations [4][5][6][7][8][9]. The aim of this population study was to make forensic database in Ovambo population from Namibia using AmpFlSTR Profiler Kit.…”
Section: Results: Seementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Identifiler system includes the 13 CODIS along with 2 additional loci, D2S1338 and D19S433, which are used in most forensic labs to determine parentage (Collins et al, 2004). It has been shown that the D6S1043 and D12S391 loci are of high value in forensic parentage testing (Tong et al, 2010), and Penta D and Penta E are often used in forensic cases as non-CODIS markers (Salem et al, 2003;Alves et al, 2005;Chouery et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%