2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0050688
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain induced second-order Jahn–Teller reconstruction and magnetic moment modulation at monovacancy in graphene

Abstract: Using density functional theory simulations, we examine the electronic structure of an isolated monovacancy defect in graphene under symmetry-breaking deformation. Results show that the defect experiences a second-order Jahn–Teller reconstruction at a critical strain of 1.7%. It stabilizes the orientation of the JT bond relative to the loading direction and breaks the threefold degeneracy of the defect structure. We call it Jahn–Teller re-reconstruction (JTRR), and it is mechanically reversible. The reversibil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most stable nonmagnetic V 1 (55–66) structure is identified and studied, while the magnetic properties of monovacancies at other positions are discussed. This investigation clarifies the origin of the inconsistent magnetic moments of a freestanding monovacancy reported in the previous literature. ,, It re-confirms the existence and the essential stabilizing effect of the V 1 (55–66) bond reconstruction, previously reported by Santos et al, now using a more rigorous a priori approach that determines the ripple configurations before adding the defects. The relationship between the local geometry of monovacancies and the magnetic moment of the system is also explored in detail.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The most stable nonmagnetic V 1 (55–66) structure is identified and studied, while the magnetic properties of monovacancies at other positions are discussed. This investigation clarifies the origin of the inconsistent magnetic moments of a freestanding monovacancy reported in the previous literature. ,, It re-confirms the existence and the essential stabilizing effect of the V 1 (55–66) bond reconstruction, previously reported by Santos et al, now using a more rigorous a priori approach that determines the ripple configurations before adding the defects. The relationship between the local geometry of monovacancies and the magnetic moment of the system is also explored in detail.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The calculated magnetic moment of the monovacancy is 2 μ B , which comprises one unpaired electron from the dangling sp 2 bond and 1/3 of an electron from each 2p z orbital of the 3 neighbors of the monovacancy . The computed magnetic moments of a monovacancy in periodic systems have frequently been reported as fractional values between 1 and 2 μ B in previous studies. ,,, This was considered to originate from the finite size effects in periodic calculations and Rodrigo et al suggested that the magnetic moment of an isolated monovacancy converges to 2 μ B using large-scale DFT up to 30 × 30 supercell. However, the current study suggests that an alternative explanation for the inconsistency lies in the well-known electron self-interaction error of DFT, which is significant for the previously used (semi-)­local functionals based on local spin density approximation (LSDA) and GGA. ,, The consequences of this error have been widely documented in strongly correlated systems resulting from the electron confinement that occurs in dangling bonds or n-doped systems. , Pisani et al estimated a significant Hubbard U parameter of ∼3.25 eV for graphene ribbons with the GGA–PBE functional, indicating the large self-interaction that exists in the nonbonding localized orbitals when the π band of graphene is disrupted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…151–155 Naturally, it follows that Mulliken population analysis is basis-dependent, which is significant in molecular systems because of the local nature of basis sets, but reduced in ionic systems, for which the basis set is optimized for crystal orbitals. 156–159 Since the calculated the TMOs μ B with all DFs were compared using the same basis set, any error should be systematic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%