2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain partitioning and strain localization in medium manganese steels measured by in situ microscopic digital image correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, there have been numerous efforts to analyze the impact of annealing parameters during the IA on the initial microstructure and the partitioning of alloying elements on the individual phases [1,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Subsequent studies have dealt with the activation of secondary deformation mechanisms in γ and the strain partitioning in the microstructural constituents of different hardness [23][24][25][26]. However, most of the work on the analysis of mechanical properties has been performed within a small range of strain rates in the quasistatic tensile testing regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, there have been numerous efforts to analyze the impact of annealing parameters during the IA on the initial microstructure and the partitioning of alloying elements on the individual phases [1,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Subsequent studies have dealt with the activation of secondary deformation mechanisms in γ and the strain partitioning in the microstructural constituents of different hardness [23][24][25][26]. However, most of the work on the analysis of mechanical properties has been performed within a small range of strain rates in the quasistatic tensile testing regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the volume fraction, morphology, distribution, and orientation relationship between matrix and second phase can affect the strain heterogeneity. Strain heterogeneity usually results in strain partitioning, localization and shear band formation, thus significantly affecting the mechanical and fracture behaviour of dual or multi-phase materials [21][22][23]. Analysis of the strain distribution and partitioning from the grain level down to the sub-micrometer scale can provide valuable insights regarding the mechanical and fracture behaviour of multi-phase Mg-Al-Ca alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small speckle size or use of nanoparticles such as SiO2 or Al2O3 enables to measure the local strain at a sub-micrometer scale using scanning in (SEM) as demonstrated e.g. by Dutta et al [21] for a medium Mn steel and Zubair et al [16] for Mg-Al-Ca alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was attributed to the transformation of γ to ϵ and α ′‐martensite and a lower rate of dynamic recovery in γ . Dutta et al also reported that during uniaxial tension to 0.05 and 0.07 the strains, γ accommodated the majority of the strain. However, after uniaxial tension to strains greater than 0.07, the α ′‐martensite accommodated higher strains compared to γ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It follows that in the present steel, the phase transformation of the metastable γ to ϵ and α ′‐martensite phases and the variation in the load partitioning between the three phases coincided with localisations in the axial and shear strain values beyond ≈0.01–0.015 macroscopic true strain (or the beginning of the Regions B 625 and B 700 ). μ‐DIC axial strain mapping showed a higher strain in γ compared to α ′‐martensite indicating strain partitioning in an Fe–12Mn–3Al–0.05C steel upon uniaxial tension . This was attributed to the transformation of γ to ϵ and α ′‐martensite and a lower rate of dynamic recovery in γ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%