Strange and multistrange particle production in Au + Au collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">NN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>62.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> GeV

Aggarwal, M. M.; Ahammed, Z.; Alakhverdyants, A. V.; Alekseev, I.; Alford, J.; Anderson, B. D.; Anson, C.; Arkhipkin, D.; Averichev, G. S.; Balewski, J.; Beavis, D.; Bellwied, R.; Betancourt, M.; Betts, R. R.; Bhasin, A.; Bhati, A. K.; Bichsel, H.; Bielčík, J.; Bielčíková, J.; Biritz, B.; Bland, L. C.; Borowski, W.; Bouchet, J.; Braidot, E.; Brandin, A. V.; Bridgeman, A.; Brovko, S. G.; Bruna, E.; Bueltmann, S.; Bunzarov, I.; Burton, T. P.; Cai, X. Z.; Caines, H.; Sánchez, M. Calderón De La Barca; Cebra, D.; Cendejas, R.; Cervantes, M. C.; Chajęcki, Z.; Chaloupka, P.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Chen, H. F.; Chen, J. H.; Chen, J. Y.; Cheng, J.; Cherney, M.; Chikanian, A.; Choi, K. E.; Christie, W.; Chung, P.; Codrington, M. J. M.; Corliss, R.; Cramer, J. G.; Crawford, H. J.; Dash, S.; Leyva, A. Davila; Silva, L. C. De; Debbe, R.; Dedovich, T. G.; Derevschikov, A. A.; Souza, R. Derradi de; Didenko, L.; Djawotho, P.; Dogra, S.; Dong, X.; Drachenberg, J. L.; Draper, J. E.; Dunlop, J. C.; Mazumdar, M. R. Dutta; Efimov, L. G.; Elnimr, M.; Engelage, J.; Eppley, G.; Estienne, M.; Eun, L.; Evdokimov, O.; Fatemi, R.; Fedorišin, J.; Fersch, R. G.; Finch, E.; Fine, V.; Fisyak, Y.; Gagliardi, C. A.; Gangadharan, D. R.; Geromitsos, A.; Geurts, F. J. M.; Ghosh, P.; Gorbunov, Y. N.; Gordon, A.; Grebenyuk, O. G.; Grosnick, D.; Guertin, S. M.; Gupta, A.; Guryn, W.; Haag, B.; Hajkova, O.; Hamed, A.; Han, L.; Harris, J. W.; Hays-Wehle, J. P.; Heinz, M.; Heppelmann, S.; Hirsch, A.; Hjort, E.; Hoffmann, G. W.; Hofman, D. J.; Huang, B.; Huang, H. Z.; Humanic, T. J.; Huo, L.; Igo, G.; Jacobs, P.; Jacobs, W. W.; Jena, C.; Jin, F.; Joseph, J.; Judd, E. G.; Kabana, S.; Kang, K.; Kapitan, J.; Kauder, K.; Keane, D.; Kechechyan, A.; Kettler, David; Kikoła, D. P.; Kiryluk, J.; Kisiel, A.; Kizka, V.; Klein, S. R.; Knospe, A. G.; Koetke, D. D.; Kollegger, T.; Konzer, J.; Koralt, I.; Koroleva, L. I.; Korsch, W.; Kotchenda, L.; Kouchpil, V.; Кравцов, П.; Krueger, K.; Krůs, M.; Kumar, L.; Kurnadi, P.; Lamont, M. A.C.; Landgraf, J. M.; LaPointe, S.; Lauret, J.; Lebedev, A.; Lednický, R.; Lee, J. H.; Leight, W. A.; LeVine, M. J.; Li, C.; Li, L.; Li, N.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Li, Z. M.; Lisa, M. A.; Liu, F.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Ljubičić, T.; Llope, W. J.; Longacre, R. S.; Love, W. A.; Lu, Y.; Lukashov, E. V.; Luo, X.; L., G.; G., Y.; Mahapatra, D. P.; Majka, R.; Mall, O.; Mangotra, L. K.; Manweiler, R.; Margetis, S.; Markert, C.; Masui, H.; Matis, H. S.; Matulenko, Yu. A.; McDonald, D.; McShane, T. S.; Meschanin, A.; Milner, R.; Minaev, N. G.; Mioduszewski, S.; Mischke, A.; Mitrovski, M.; Mohanty, B.; Mondal, M. M.; Morozov, B.; Морозов, Д. А.; Munhoz, M. G.; Naglis, M.; Nandi, B. K.; Nayak, T. K.; Netrakanti, P. K.; Ng, M. J.; Nogach, L. V.; Nurushev, S. B.; Odyniec, G.; Ogawa, A.; Oh, K.; Ohlson, A.; Okorokov, V.; Oldag, E. W.; Olson, D.; Pachr, M.; Page, B. S.; Pal, Subrata; Pandit, Y.; Panebratsev, Y.; Pawlak, T.; Pei, H.; Peitzmann, T.; Perkins, C.; Peryt, W.; Phatak, S. C.; Pile, P.; Planinić, M.; Płoskoń, M.; Pluta, J.; Plyku, D.; Poljak, N.; Poskanzer, A. M.; Potukuchi, B.; Powell, C. B.; Prindle, D.; Pruneau, C.; Pruthi, N. K.; Pujahari, P. R.; Putschke, J.; Qiu, H.; Raniwala, R.; Raniwala, S.; Ray, R. L.; Redwine, R.; Reed, R.; Ritter, H. G.; Roberts, J.; Rogachevskiy, O. V.; Romero, J. L.; Rose, A.; Ruan, L.; Rusňák, J.; Sakai, S.; Sakrejda, I.; Sakuma, T.; Salur, S.; Sandweiss, J.; Sangaline, E.; Schambach, J.; Scharenberg, R. P.; Schmah, A.; Schmitz, N.; Schuster, T.; Seele, J.; Seger, J.; Selyuzhenkov, I.; Seyboth, P.; Shahaliev, E.; Shao, M.; Sharma, M.; Shi, S. S.; Sichtermann, E. P.; Simon, F.; Singaraju, R.; Skoby, M. J.; Smirnov, N.; Sorensen, P.; Speltz, J.; Spinka, H.; Srivastava, B.; Stanislaus, T. D. S.; Staszak, D.; Steadman, S. G.; Stevens, J. R.; Stock, R.; Strikhanov, M.; Stringfellow, B.; Suaide, A. A. P.; Suarez, M. C.; Subba, N. L.; Šumbera, M.; Sun, X. M.; Sun, Y.; Sun, Z.; Surrow, B.; Svirida, D. N.; Symons, T. J. M.; Toledo, A. Szanto de; Takahashi, J.; Tang, A. H.; Tang, Z.; Tarini, L. H.; Tarnowsky, T.; Thein, D.; Thomas, J. H.; Tian, J.; Timmins, A. R.; Tlusty, D.; Tokarev, M.; Trainor, T. A.; Tram, V. N.; Trentalange, S.; Tribble, R. E.; Tribedy, P.; Tsai, O. D.; Ullrich, T.; Underwood, D. G.; Buren, G. Van; Nieuwenhuizen, G. van; Vanfossen, J. A.; Varma, R.; Vasconcelos, G. M.S.; Vasiliev, A.; Videbæk, F.; Viyogi, Y. P.; Vokál, S.; Voloshin, S. A.; Wada, M.; Walker, M.; Wang, F.; Wang, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, J. S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X. L.; Wang, Y.; Webb, G.; Webb, J. C.; Westfall, G. D.; Whitten, C.; Wieman, H.; Wissink, S. W.; Witt, R.; Witzke, W.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Xie; Xu, H.; Xu, N.; Xu, Q. H.; Xu, W.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Xue, L.; Yang, Y.; Yepes, P.; Yip, K.; Yoo, I. K.; Yue, Q.; Zawisza, M.; Zbroszczyk, H.; Zhan, W.; Zhang, J. B.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, W. M.; Zhang, X. P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z. P.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Zhong; Zhou, Wei; Zhu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zoulkarneev, R.; Zoulkarneeva, Y.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.024901

Cited by 112 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 75 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Data Analysis: − We have used AGS [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65], SPS [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75], RHIC [76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91] and LHC [92][93][94][95] data for our analysis. STAR BES data has been used following [49,96,97].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel scheme for parametrizing the chemical freeze-out surface in heavy ion collision experiments

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel scheme for parametrizing the chemical freeze-out surface in heavy ion collision experiments

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We have used AGS [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70], SPS [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80], RHIC [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96] and LHC [97][98][99][100] data for our analysis. The data for STAR BES is obtained from Ref [48,55,101].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematics of chemical freeze-out parameters in heavy-ion collision experiments

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We discuss systematic uncertainties in the chemical freeze-out parameters from the χ 2 analysis of hadron multiplicity ratios in the heavy-ion collision experiments. The systematics due to the choice of specific hadron ratios are found to lie within the experimental uncertainties. The variations obtained by removing the usual constraints on the conserved charges show similar behavior. The net charge to net baryon ratios in such unconstrained systems are commensurate with the expected value obtained from the protons and neutrons of the colliding nuclei up to the center of mass energies ∼ 40 GeV. Beyond that the uncertainties in this ratio gradually increases, possibly indicating the reduction in baryon stopping.

show abstract

“…E866(5 GeV) NA49 (6,9,12,17 GeV) STAR (7.7,11.5,39,200 [26,27,57] are obtained in different rapidity slices, while the SPS results [21,50,63] are measured at midrapidity. The ALICE particle ratios [62] are also presented.…”

Section: A Baryons-to-kaons Ratiosmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The dependence of antiproton-to-proton on antikaonto-kaon was reported to play a significant role in observing antihadron-to-hadron asymmetry in central heavy-ion collisions [13]. In the present work, we introduce a systematic analysis of the energy-dependence of four antibaryon-to-baryon ratios normalized to the antikaon-to-kaon ratio measured in different experiments [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. We utilize this in order to propose an alternative approach determining µ s .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Strangeness chemical potential from the baryons relative to the kaons particle ratios

Tawfik

Wahab

Yassin

et al. 2017

Int. J. Mod. Phys. E

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From a systematic analysis of the energy-dependence of four antibaryon-to-baryon ratios relative to the antikaon-to-kaon ratio, we propose an alternative approach determining the strange-quark chemical potential (µ s ). It is found that µ s generically genuinely equals one-fifth the baryon chemical potential (µ b ). An additional quantity depending on µ b and the freezeout temperature (T ) should be added in order to assure averaged strangeness conversation. This quantity gives a genuine estimation for the possible strangeness enhancement with the increase in the collision energy. At the chemical freezeout conditioned to constant entropy density normalized to temperature cubed, various particle ratios calculated at T and µ b and the resultant µ s excellently agree with the statistical-thermal calculations.

show abstract

Strange and multistrange particle production in Au + Au collisions atsNN=62.4 GeV

Cited by 112 publications

References 75 publications

Novel scheme for parametrizing the chemical freeze-out surface in heavy ion collision experiments

Novel scheme for parametrizing the chemical freeze-out surface in heavy ion collision experiments

Systematics of chemical freeze-out parameters in heavy-ion collision experiments

Strangeness chemical potential from the baryons relative to the kaons particle ratios

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About