2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2010.00417.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STRATEGIC INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AND COMPETITION FOR AN IMPERFECTLY PROTECTED INNOVATION*

Abstract: The imperfect appropriability of revenues from innovation affects the incentives of firms to invest, and to disclose information about their innovative productivity. It creates a free-rider effect in the competition for the innovation that countervails the familiar business-stealing effect. Moreover, it affects the disclosure incentives such that full disclosure emerges for extreme revenue spillovers (e.g., full protection and no protection of intellectual property), but either partial disclosure or full conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They show that even if information sharing can increase the profit of each firm, firms will conceal information in equilibrium. Jansen (2010) studies the information sharing in R&D competition. He shows that the incentive to disclose information depends on whether the winner firm of an R&D race is capable of appropriating the full revenue of its innovation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that even if information sharing can increase the profit of each firm, firms will conceal information in equilibrium. Jansen (2010) studies the information sharing in R&D competition. He shows that the incentive to disclose information depends on whether the winner firm of an R&D race is capable of appropriating the full revenue of its innovation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…radical) innovations from imitation and harness the full benefit of their commercialisation. In the same vein, Jansen (2010) argued that incentives to strategically disclose information depend on the trade-off between two effects: business stealing and free riding that come from information asymmetries. The business stealing effect emerges when firms, while competing for an innovation where winner takes all, over-invest in R&D. The free rider effect appears when the winner firm of an R&D race is not capable of appropriating the full revenue of its innovation, because the later generates positive externalities (see Jansen 2010, p. 350).…”
Section: Contracting For Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2010]). DOI: 10.14267/phd.2016006 Az információk megosztásának az innovátor üzletére negatív következményei is lehetnek, az üzlet lehetséges ellopásának veszélye és a továbbgyűrűző hatásoknak köszönhető potyautas magatartás miatt (Jansen [2010] A kontraszelekció következményei ellen a jól informált félnek, jelen esetben a vállalkozónak lehetősége van jelzéssel (signalling) felfednie a projektjének típusát.…”
Section: áBra: Az áLlami Beavatkozás Formáiunclassified