2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphic position of the ∼1000Ma Sukhda Tuff (Chhattisgarh Supergroup, India) and the 500Ma question

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malone et al (2008) noted that the youngest population of zircons from the Upper Bhander is older than 1000 Ma. This observation, coupled with the similarity in paleomagnetic directions from the Upper Vindhyan and the 1073.5 ± 13.7 Ma age of the Majhgawan kimberlite (Gregory et al, 2006), it is concluded that the Upper Vindhyan sedimentation was completed by ∼1000 Ma, a result consistent with recent geochronologic data from the Chhattisgarh basin to the south (Patranabis- Basu et al, 2008). The paleomagnetic data from the Bhander and Rewa Groups of the Upper Vindhyan sequence yield pole positions that overlap with the Majhgawan kimberlitic pole (Gregory et al, 2006).…”
Section: ∼11-10 Ga Reconstructionssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malone et al (2008) noted that the youngest population of zircons from the Upper Bhander is older than 1000 Ma. This observation, coupled with the similarity in paleomagnetic directions from the Upper Vindhyan and the 1073.5 ± 13.7 Ma age of the Majhgawan kimberlite (Gregory et al, 2006), it is concluded that the Upper Vindhyan sedimentation was completed by ∼1000 Ma, a result consistent with recent geochronologic data from the Chhattisgarh basin to the south (Patranabis- Basu et al, 2008). The paleomagnetic data from the Bhander and Rewa Groups of the Upper Vindhyan sequence yield pole positions that overlap with the Majhgawan kimberlitic pole (Gregory et al, 2006).…”
Section: ∼11-10 Ga Reconstructionssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Age constraints are generally lacking in most of these basins; however, Chakraborty (2006) tentatively called all of these basins 'classic examples of Proterozoic intracontinental basins' within India and remarked on similarity in their lithologies, depositional environments and stratigraphic architecture. Recent work in both the Vindhyan and Chhattisgarh basins (the results come from these basins only) supports Meso-Paleoproterozoic ages for these basins (Malone et al, 2008;Patranabis-Deb et al, 2008;Basu et al, 2008;Das et al, 2009).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The downward revision of age into the Mesoproterozoic proposed here for the Bhima and Kurnool (Palnad) basins is in tune with similar proposals made in recent years (e.g., Patranabis-Deb et al 2007;Malone et al 2008;Basu et al 2008;Das et al 2009) for the Chattisgarh and Upper Vindhyan sediments in Central India, which are generally considered to be homotaxial with the Bhima/Kurnool (Palnad) basins, based primarily on lithostratigraphic correlations (e.g., Naqvi 2005).…”
Section: Lithostratigraphic Correlationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Recent paleomagnetic study combined with detrital zircon geochronology (Malone et al 2008) has painted an altogether different picture by suggesting 1000-1070 Ma age range for the Upper Vindhyans which contradicts all previous estimates and assumptions. Assuming this age estimate to be correct, the Upper Vindhyan succession becomes time contemporaneous to the sedimentary sequence of the Raipur Group in Chattisgarh basin of central India (Basu et al 2008).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%