2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2009.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphy, age, and flora of the Southport forest bed, Southeastern Wisconsin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the varved unit is underlain by an extensive organic deposit containing plant macrofossils and in situ trees-the remains of a forest that was drowned and buried by a rise in lake level. Elsewhere in the Upper Great Lakes, buried forests have provided key insight into lake level fluctuations, glacial chronology, and paleovegetation composition during the Holocene (Lowell et al 1999;Pregitzer et al 2000;Lewis et al 2005;Hunter et al 2006;Schneider et al 2009). In the present study, we report the first buried forest from the north shore of Lake Superior and one of only a small number of similar deposits known across the Great Lakes basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the varved unit is underlain by an extensive organic deposit containing plant macrofossils and in situ trees-the remains of a forest that was drowned and buried by a rise in lake level. Elsewhere in the Upper Great Lakes, buried forests have provided key insight into lake level fluctuations, glacial chronology, and paleovegetation composition during the Holocene (Lowell et al 1999;Pregitzer et al 2000;Lewis et al 2005;Hunter et al 2006;Schneider et al 2009). In the present study, we report the first buried forest from the north shore of Lake Superior and one of only a small number of similar deposits known across the Great Lakes basin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Lewis (1969), this new phase, the Nipissing II, existed until about 4.0 ka when lake level fell to the level of the Algoma phase. Contemporary and subsequent researchers in the Lake Michigan-Huron and Lake Superior basins added data to improve understanding about the age of these events (e.g., Winkler, 1962;Farrand and Miller, 1968;Lewis, 1970;Larsen, 1974;Gutschick and Gonsiewski, 1976;Cowan, 1978;Monaghan et al, 1986;Lewis and Anderson, 1989;Thompson, 1989;Terasmae, 1979;Timmons et al, 2007;Schneider et al, 2009). Combined, however, these data yield a wide spectrum of ages for the initiation and duration of the Nipissing phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%