2007
DOI: 10.17487/rfc5061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Reconfiguration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
202
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
202
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current Internet architecture has been accused of ossification [42], but has supported numerous extensions, including shim layers (SHIM6 [40], HIP [38], MPLS [47], security with IPsec and IKE [33,34], and TLS [17]), as well as new transport protocols (DCCP [36], RTP [49], SCTP [51]), and other services (P2P nets, performance enhancing proxies [9], BEEP [46]). Many of these extensions challenge the current use of largely static protocol stacks, making it difficult to support virtualization (i.e., VPNs, virtualization as in the X-Bone [53], partial overlays for routing as with RONs [1] and Detour [48], and recursive overlays [54]) and to support on-the-fly addition of capabilities (such as to react to attacks) or changes (from IPv4 to IPv6).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current Internet architecture has been accused of ossification [42], but has supported numerous extensions, including shim layers (SHIM6 [40], HIP [38], MPLS [47], security with IPsec and IKE [33,34], and TLS [17]), as well as new transport protocols (DCCP [36], RTP [49], SCTP [51]), and other services (P2P nets, performance enhancing proxies [9], BEEP [46]). Many of these extensions challenge the current use of largely static protocol stacks, making it difficult to support virtualization (i.e., VPNs, virtualization as in the X-Bone [53], partial overlays for routing as with RONs [1] and Detour [48], and recursive overlays [54]) and to support on-the-fly addition of capabilities (such as to react to attacks) or changes (from IPv4 to IPv6).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration (DAR) extension, referred to as Mobile SCTP (mSCTP) [130,131], was proposed in [72] to support the end-to-end controlled transport mobility. The SCTP DAR extension enables a dynamical IP address configuration on mobile hosts, which means that there are able to dynamically add new IP addresses, delete unnecessary IP addresses, and change the primary IP address in the address list on the fly withput interrupting/terminating the service session.…”
Section: Mobility Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mSCTP supports vertical handoff because of its multi-homing feature and DAR (Dynamic Address Reconfiguration) extension [13]. With the movement of MN, mSCTPbased handoff includes three DAR operations: adding new acquired IP address, changing the primary IP address and deleting the unavailable IP address.…”
Section: B Vertical Handoff Based On Msctpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mSCTP also uses retransmission mechanism for reliable transmission [13]. The timer is T4-rtx with initial value 1s.…”
Section: B Average Transmission Delay Over Wireless Link In Msctpmentioning
confidence: 99%