2009
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streambank dewatering for increased stability

Abstract: Abstract:Streambank erosion is often the dominant source of sediment leaving modified watersheds. Mass failure of high, steep banks is one of the most serious forms of streambank erosion. The risk of a given bank experiencing mass failure is a function of bank height, angle, and soil strength, which is governed by soil moisture. Two methods for bank dewatering were tested in adjacent sections of streambank bordering a deeply incised channel in northern Mississippi: a low-cost pump system and subsurface horizon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under baseflow conditions, however, increased drainage of the bank associated with burrow presence may reduce antecedent near‐bank face pore water pressures, reducing susceptibility to erosion during lower magnitude flow events. A similar effect has been observed in artificially drained high, steep river banks (Shields et al, ). Further research is needed to quantify the hydrological significance of burrows and their implications for bank stability.…”
Section: A Conceptual Model For Burrow‐induced Bank Erosionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Under baseflow conditions, however, increased drainage of the bank associated with burrow presence may reduce antecedent near‐bank face pore water pressures, reducing susceptibility to erosion during lower magnitude flow events. A similar effect has been observed in artificially drained high, steep river banks (Shields et al, ). Further research is needed to quantify the hydrological significance of burrows and their implications for bank stability.…”
Section: A Conceptual Model For Burrow‐induced Bank Erosionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Both these factors are controlled by the permeability of the soil and difference in hydraulic head. The relationship between depth of water tables and depth of erosion gully is in line with the understanding (see Shields et al 2009Shields et al , 2010 of changing hydraulic head by lowering the outlet (Figure 4). However, the response of the observations in group 9 does not relate to the degree of drainage, implying localised hillslope aquifers supply water at a high rate, balancing the drainage.…”
Section: Water Levelssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…With the lowering and widening of the streambed, wetlands are often dewatered as groundwater will flow towards incised streams as opposed to parallel to unincised streams (Shields et al 2009(Shields et al , 2010. Water flow through incised wetlands is concentrated to the stream channel and high turbidity flow with high erosive energy are often recorded (Shields et al 2009). Increased sediment loss and reduced base flows results in increase in pollution levels, degradation of the physical habitat and consequently a reduction in biodiversity (Shields et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shear strength and weight changes destabilize the bank and cause failures along incised channels (Langendoen et al, 2013;. Thus, preventing water table rise and maintaining unsaturated conditions (negative pore water pressure) could provide greater bank stability and reduced mass failure frequency (Shields et al, 2009). Gullies in the Ethiopia highlands formed after the deforestation in the late 1980s have been advancing uphill (Tebebu et al, 2010;Zegeye et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%