2022
DOI: 10.1080/20426445.2022.2050549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength grading of timber in the UK and Ireland in 2021

Abstract: This paper summarises the state of the art for strength grading of construction timber grown in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. It includes the latest approvals based on recent research on spruce, larch and Douglas-fir. It lists the following information along with the primary references: visual grading grades and strength class assignments; grading machines with approved settings for machine control grading; the species, size ranges and strength class combinations covered; and grade determinin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the results are comparable to data reported for PSMN from the UK [15], and data collected within the GradeWood project by BRE (unpublished). The two genera produce higher timber quality than Sitka spruce [7,16] and the GDPs are comparable enough between themselves producing yields above 80% for the strength class C18 investigated in this paper as shown in Table 3. The optimum grading for the entire population was C20, that is, the one that results from using the values of the destructive tests instead of those based on the IP.…”
Section: Gpds Of Ungraded Timbermentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the results are comparable to data reported for PSMN from the UK [15], and data collected within the GradeWood project by BRE (unpublished). The two genera produce higher timber quality than Sitka spruce [7,16] and the GDPs are comparable enough between themselves producing yields above 80% for the strength class C18 investigated in this paper as shown in Table 3. The optimum grading for the entire population was C20, that is, the one that results from using the values of the destructive tests instead of those based on the IP.…”
Section: Gpds Of Ungraded Timbermentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Table 4 also shows settings for the combination C18/batten14. Batten14 is a user-defined strength class with characteristic values of: fk = 14 N/mm 2 ; E0,mean = 7.5 kN/mm 2 and ρk = 330 kg/m 3 [7]. The peculiarity of this grade is that fk is the same as in C14, but E0,mean and ρk are higher.…”
Section: Calculation Of Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This timber grade is commonly used in Ireland and the UK for roof trusses. TR26 grade timber has characterisitic and mean densities of and 370 kg/m 3 and 444 kg/m 3 , respectively [24]. The moisture content of the timber boards at the time of recovery was estimated using a hand-held moisture meter to be between 18% and 23%.…”
Section: Recovered Timber Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%