2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength of adsorption of polyethylene glycol on pretreated Pinus radiata wood and consequences for enzymatic saccharification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these information, the important loss in fluorescence observed in the SE samples can be attributed to one or several of the following causes: decrease of lignin content; alteration of linkages between monolignols making lignin; modification of the cross-linkages between lignin and hemicellulose and of the organization of the polymers (mainly cellulose and hemicellulose) surrounding lignin. If SE samples fluorescence was expected to be mainly influenced by the packing polymers around lignin, a possible approach could be to assay the lignin chemical and physical accessibility in the pretreated samples 39 , 40 , but since samples were “exploded” after pretreatment, these techniques could not be applied. Previously, an in-depth chemical analysis of the same pretreated samples was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these information, the important loss in fluorescence observed in the SE samples can be attributed to one or several of the following causes: decrease of lignin content; alteration of linkages between monolignols making lignin; modification of the cross-linkages between lignin and hemicellulose and of the organization of the polymers (mainly cellulose and hemicellulose) surrounding lignin. If SE samples fluorescence was expected to be mainly influenced by the packing polymers around lignin, a possible approach could be to assay the lignin chemical and physical accessibility in the pretreated samples 39 , 40 , but since samples were “exploded” after pretreatment, these techniques could not be applied. Previously, an in-depth chemical analysis of the same pretreated samples was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two key amino acids, Tyr 171 and Asn 184, contributed to CBHI activity enhancement by PEG . On the lignin‐blocking function, the binding constant of PEG on pre‐treated biomass was 10‐times higher than the constant for cellulase‐lignin binding . However, PEG chemicals show minimal effect on EG and BG…”
Section: Strategies To Minimize Cellulase‐lignin Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is confirmed by the measurement of interaction forces by atomic force microscopy: interactions are stronger between cellulases and lignin than between cellulase and cellulose [ 11 ]. Microscopic observations using PEG have demonstrated that solvent-exposed lignin is likely to be responsible for non-productive binding of enzymes [ 12 ] so that addition of PEG during saccharification increases glucose yields [ 13 ] by keeping cellulases free. Different spectroscopic analysis, surface accessibility, and adsorption measurements have been carried out to correlate the presence of chemical motifs belonging to different biomass samples with the binding of enzymes [ 14 , 15 ], but data are difficult to interpret.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%