2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength of carbon fiber reinforced polymers bonded to concrete and masonry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the crack development of CFRP with a width ratio of 0.53, the crack typically starts from the top and forms a shear crack before CFRP rupture. As the width ratio increases, the failure mode changes from CFRP rupture to plate end interfacial debonding with a thin concrete layer attached to the debonded CFRP sheet [11]. Although the failure mode of specimens attached to CFRP with width ratios of 0.8 and 1 was plate end interfacial debonding, it is proven that the ultimate load is higher as stated in this study (refer Table 1).…”
Section: Load Versus Deflection Of Concrete With Various Width Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However, for the crack development of CFRP with a width ratio of 0.53, the crack typically starts from the top and forms a shear crack before CFRP rupture. As the width ratio increases, the failure mode changes from CFRP rupture to plate end interfacial debonding with a thin concrete layer attached to the debonded CFRP sheet [11]. Although the failure mode of specimens attached to CFRP with width ratios of 0.8 and 1 was plate end interfacial debonding, it is proven that the ultimate load is higher as stated in this study (refer Table 1).…”
Section: Load Versus Deflection Of Concrete With Various Width Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Figure 6 presents the box plot and safety factors of different equations. It can be seen that the Neubauer and Rostàsy (1997), Adhikary and Mutsuyoshi (2001), De lorenzis et al (2001), JCI (2003), Dai et al (2005) and Camli and Binici (2007) generally overestimate the bond strength and are completely non-conservative. Conversely, the predictions of Tanaka (1996), Khalifa et al (1998), andYang et al (2001) are conservative.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1980s many researchers have developed various equations for predicting bond strength between FRP and concrete substrate, including van Gemert (1980), Tanaka (1996), Yoshizawa and Wu (1997), Maeda et al (1997), Neubauer and Rostasy (1997), Khalifa et al (1998), Adhikary and Mutsuyoshi (2001), Teng (2001), De Lorenzis et al (2001), Yang et al 2001, JCI (2003, Dai et al (2005), , and Camli and Binici (2007). Furthermore, the international federation for structural concrete (fib) (2001) and CNR-DT200/2004 design guidelines also present different formulae for estimating the bond strength of FRPto-concrete elements.…”
Section: Existing Bond Strength Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it has been decreasing the crack width of concrete [13,14]. Due to the advantageous properties, fiber composites have been used in concrete structures [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%