This paper aims to study market integration in the international trade of soybeans from 1999 to 2019. The hypothesis is that the market remained integrated between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM soy, even after stringent regulations against GM soy in major importers starting in 1999. Using FOB prices from major exporters of GM soy (USA and Argentina) and non-GM soy (Brazil), I test for market integration with cointegration analysis and Granger causality tests. All tests show that the market between all three exporters remained integrated throughout the sample period. Furthermore, Granger causality tests show that USA remains the sole price leader. Short run elasticities for reactions to American price changes in Brazil and Argentina are 0.33 and 0.25, respectively. The results validate the Law of One Price and inform policy decisions and forecasts efforts in this valuable commodity.Moreover, the EU, who collectively make up the second largest importer, has banned trade of GM soy varieties, starting in 1999 with a moratorium on trade of GM food, fixed in place by stringent new regulations in 2003, and then formalized in bans across numerous member countries. Also China, currently the biggest importer by a large margin, has placed stringent regulations on GM soy trade, including prohibition of direct consumption, all imports are exclusively for industrial use, and long delays in approving individual GM varieties. Because each new GM event requires each separate country's approval before it can be freely traded, this causes further trade disruptions as specific new events are approved in exporting countries but not yet in the importers.