2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Breaks, the Export Enhancement Program and the Relationship between Canadian and US Hard Wheat Prices

Abstract: This paper examines the long-term relationship between the export prices of Canadian and US hard wheat and the effects of the US Export Enhancement Program (EEP). Using monthly prices for 1974-2001, we adopt the cointegration procedure of Johansen "et al." (2000) which permits structural breaks. Results show that a long-term relationship exists, and there are two breaks that coincide with the EEP. The first break is in late 1985 when the long-term US/Canadian price ratio fell by 5.5%, while the second is in ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, rejection of the null hypothesis that a Y 1 ¼ 0, non-rejection of the null hypothesis that a Y 2 ¼ 0 refers to the notion that Y 1;t is endogenous and Y 2;t is weakly exogenous (see Dawson and Sanjuan, 2005).…”
Section: Vecm Restrictions Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, rejection of the null hypothesis that a Y 1 ¼ 0, non-rejection of the null hypothesis that a Y 2 ¼ 0 refers to the notion that Y 1;t is endogenous and Y 2;t is weakly exogenous (see Dawson and Sanjuan, 2005).…”
Section: Vecm Restrictions Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further test the break point, Johansen tests were run on two models, where one was fit with a dummy variable to account for the break and one without it, and then compare the results. Dawson, Sanjuan, and White (2006) and Dawson and Sanjuan (2006) have proven the validity of this method. The results, listed in Table 3, show that per our expectations, Johansen's procedure fails to detect cointegration without the break, whereas two cointegrating vectors were found with the break placed inside the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…If structural breaks have been identified, dummy variables will be used to control for their effects (Dawson, Sanjuan, & White, 2006;Dawson & Sanjuan, 2006).…”
Section: Identification Of Structural Breakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where q is the number of divided sample periods, Dj,t-I = 1 if t = 1}-1 + i (forj = 2, .., q and i = 1, ..., k) and 0 otherwise, and E, = I if 1}-1 + k + 1 t~1} and 0 otherwise [see Dawson and Sanjuan (2006) for a detailed application] .…”
Section: Tests For Unit Roots Under Structural Changementioning
confidence: 99%