2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural economic vulnerability, openness and bilateral development aid flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the size of the population could positively influence FDI inflows if the main objective of the multinationals undertaking the FDI in a host country is to serve the domestic market. However, if the chief motivation of these multinationals is to export either to neighbouring countries of the host countries or to the countries pertaining to the same regional integration area with the host country, or even to the rest of the world in general, then the population would matter less for attracting these FDIs (e.g., Gnangnon & Iyer, 2017). As for remittances, we argue here that the small countries, that is, those with a small population, likely face significant constraints on trade and economic growth opportunities that remittances could alleviate.…”
Section: Discussion On the Other Possible Determinants Of Diversificamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the size of the population could positively influence FDI inflows if the main objective of the multinationals undertaking the FDI in a host country is to serve the domestic market. However, if the chief motivation of these multinationals is to export either to neighbouring countries of the host countries or to the countries pertaining to the same regional integration area with the host country, or even to the rest of the world in general, then the population would matter less for attracting these FDIs (e.g., Gnangnon & Iyer, 2017). As for remittances, we argue here that the small countries, that is, those with a small population, likely face significant constraints on trade and economic growth opportunities that remittances could alleviate.…”
Section: Discussion On the Other Possible Determinants Of Diversificamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk of studies, which in the development literature have examined the determinants of these three external financial flows for development, have been conducted by separating the analysis for each type of external financial flows for development. Among these studies, those that have examined the role of trade in mobilizing the external financial flows for development include, for example, Alesina and Dollar (2000) and Gnangnon (2017) for ODA inflows, and Markusen (1984), Helpman and Krugman (1985), Markusen and Venables (1995), Edwards (1992), Gastanaga, Nugent, and Pashamova (1998), Asiedu (2002), and Brun and Gnangnon (2017) for FDI inflows. Concerning remittances inflows, there is—to the best of our knowledge—no such study that has examined the impact of trade openness on remittances flows, although some studies (e.g., Head and Ries, 1998; Markusen, 1983; Mundell, 1957; Rauch, 2001; Richards, 1994) have looked at the relationship between trade and migration, which may be considered as an indirect way to assess or examine the impact of trade openness on remittances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the Economic Vulnerability Index of the Foundation for International Development Studies and Research which takes account the economic risk of States and uses indicators of high instability, the State Fragility Index combines economic, political, social, security and environmental indicators on a scale that takes into account the level of fragility depending on whether it's low, medium or extreme (McKay and Thorbecke, 2019). For Gnangnon (2017), the economic vulnerability index provides more information about the macroeconomic shock a country can bear. It's limited to measure fragility associated with macroeconomic disruptions, which in many cases are at the level of the continued decline in economic growth.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, can be accompanied by diversification of production and exports, and As a result, it creates lower structural vulnerabilities. Trade openness can improve export opportunities by increasing the number of exporters in those countries [14]. Developed countries (with better institutions and higher worker productivity) and Developing countries also specialize in more complex areas.…”
Section: Trade Openness (Out)mentioning
confidence: 99%