2008
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Identification of Piecewise-Linear Models of Genetic Regulatory Networks

Abstract: We present a method for the structural identification of genetic regulatory networks (GRNs), based on the use of a class of Piecewise-Linear (PL) models. These models consist of a set of decoupled linear models describing the different modes of operation of the GRN and discrete switches between the modes accounting for the nonlinear character of gene regulation. They thus form a compromise between the mathematical simplicity of linear models and the biological expressiveness of nonlinear models. The input of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also consider a version of Equation (8) in which there exists a hidden node (x h ) affecting (x 1 ) as shown in Figure 1(B), as well as process noise.…”
Section: Formulating a Dynamical System As A Grnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can also consider a version of Equation (8) in which there exists a hidden node (x h ) affecting (x 1 ) as shown in Figure 1(B), as well as process noise.…”
Section: Formulating a Dynamical System As A Grnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, many data-driven mathematical tools have been developed and applied to reconstruct graph representations of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from data. These include Bayesian networks, regression, correlation, mutual information and system-based approaches [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Also, these approaches either focus on static or on time series data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But Bayesian networks typically do not accommodate cycles and hence, can not handle feedback motifs that are common in genetic regulatory networks. Both causality and feedback motifs are no longer an issue when the network is modeled as a set of differential equations [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Identification is then typically optimization based, while approaches depend on whether the data is obtained from steady-state measurements [8][9][10] or dynamic time-series [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, de Jong et al developed a method for identification of GRNs using the structure of piecewise affine dynamical systems (c.f. [11], [12]). Papachristodoulou et al developed a model for identification of sparse networks using Hill functions to describe the dynamics of gene-gene interaction (c.f.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%