Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS '99) 1999
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043015-7/50059-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Performance Measurement and Design Parameter Validation for Kap Shui Mun Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum error percentage when comparing the natural frequencies obtained from the IFSM with those from the finite element analysis was 4.8%, whereas when comparing the same results with the field measurement test data, the maximum error percentage was less than 10%, except for the second vertical bending mode of the deck, for which the measurements showed considerable difference between the results. Thus, the registered data are questionable (Lau et al 1999). In general, the field measurements resulted in values for the natural frequencies of the KSM Bridge (Lau et al 1999) that were slightly lower than those obtained with both numerical methods, IFSM and FEM.…”
Section: Verification Of the Integrated Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum error percentage when comparing the natural frequencies obtained from the IFSM with those from the finite element analysis was 4.8%, whereas when comparing the same results with the field measurement test data, the maximum error percentage was less than 10%, except for the second vertical bending mode of the deck, for which the measurements showed considerable difference between the results. Thus, the registered data are questionable (Lau et al 1999). In general, the field measurements resulted in values for the natural frequencies of the KSM Bridge (Lau et al 1999) that were slightly lower than those obtained with both numerical methods, IFSM and FEM.…”
Section: Verification Of the Integrated Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the registered data are questionable (Lau et al 1999). In general, the field measurements resulted in values for the natural frequencies of the KSM Bridge (Lau et al 1999) that were slightly lower than those obtained with both numerical methods, IFSM and FEM. The first two modes reported by the IFSM and the FEM were bending tower modes; therefore, they were not reflected in the field measurement data, which considered only the deck vibration measurements.…”
Section: Verification Of the Integrated Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations