2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.06.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-aware image fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the image fusion method propsed in Figure 4 and the based-on variance calculated in discrete cosine transform domain without consistency verification (DctVar) and based-on variance calculated in discrete cosine transform domain with consistency verification (DctVarCv) [12,13] and structure-aware image fusion (SAIF) [11] methods, comparison and verification were carried out. This study was to evaluate the quality of image fusion using relevant indicators compiled by Liu et al [42].…”
Section: Image Fusion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the image fusion method propsed in Figure 4 and the based-on variance calculated in discrete cosine transform domain without consistency verification (DctVar) and based-on variance calculated in discrete cosine transform domain with consistency verification (DctVarCv) [12,13] and structure-aware image fusion (SAIF) [11] methods, comparison and verification were carried out. This study was to evaluate the quality of image fusion using relevant indicators compiled by Liu et al [42].…”
Section: Image Fusion Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, if too many decomposition stages are used, spatial similarity between the fused image and the original will be poorer [10]. Among those fusion methods, structure-aware image fusion [11] and image fusion in the discrete cosine transform (DCT) domain [12,13] are quite classic methods and widely used in various fields [14,15]. The following discusses wavelet-based image fusion in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset used in the experiments is the TNO Image Fusion Dataset, which contains registered infraredvisible image pairs in various conditions. The performance of the algorithm is tested by direct observation and comparison with seven excellent fusion algorithms, they are DenseFuse [9], MDLatLRR [32], VSM-WLS [2], SAF [33], CSR [6], FPDE [19], GTF [20].…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of Image fusion two or more images are combines with different focus values of the same picture using different fusion rules. The composite image obtained after fusion called as all-in-focus image gives more information and is more convenient to visual perception which can be further processed for the object and target detection [1][2][3][4][5]. Generally the intention of the fusion process is to combine the redundant and complementary information from multiple images to create a composite fused image that contain better properties than individual input images in terms of visual perception and suitable for secondary processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%