1985
DOI: 10.1107/s010827018500703x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of two gold(I) complexes with tricyclohexylphosphine: [(Cy3P)AuCl] and [(Cy3P)2Au]+.Cl−

Abstract: Abstract.Chloro ( The coordination in MONO is nearly linear, with a P-Au-CI angle of 177.0 (2) ° and Au-P and Au-C1 bond distances of 2.242(4) and 2.279 (5)A, respectively. In the BIS complex the C1 is ionic. The cation [(Cy3P)2Au] + is at a center of symmetry, so the two phosphines are staggered with exactly linear P--Au-P coordination and the P-Au distance is 2.321 (2) A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For further comparisons between B3LYP, TPSS and M05 functionals, we next examine the correlations between optimized structures of ClAu(PR3) and the reported X-ray crystal structures ( Figure 2). [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] According to Figure 2, the calculation results with all functionals show good agreement with the reported X-ray crystal structures, whereas the Au-Cl and Au-P bond distances of all ClAu(PR 3 ) complexes are slightly overestimated (relative to the experimental ones). The reason might be attributed to that the use of ECP slightly underestimated the electrophilicity of Au atom.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For further comparisons between B3LYP, TPSS and M05 functionals, we next examine the correlations between optimized structures of ClAu(PR3) and the reported X-ray crystal structures ( Figure 2). [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] According to Figure 2, the calculation results with all functionals show good agreement with the reported X-ray crystal structures, whereas the Au-Cl and Au-P bond distances of all ClAu(PR 3 ) complexes are slightly overestimated (relative to the experimental ones). The reason might be attributed to that the use of ECP slightly underestimated the electrophilicity of Au atom.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The geometry around the gold atom is almost perfectly linear with a P-Au-P angle of 178.16 (8) . [15,16] The sulfur atoms are located at 3.786 and 3.747 from the gold atom but this distance is too long to consider any bonding interaction. [15,16] The sulfur atoms are located at 3.786 and 3.747 from the gold atom but this distance is too long to consider any bonding interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both complexes, the coinage metal atom is in a linear [ 4 : 176.64(2)°, 5 : 172.29(2)°] coordination environment. As a result of the electron‐rich character of 3 the Au−Cl bond length in 4 [2.3415(6) Å] is significantly longer than that of [AuCl(PCy 3 )] [2.279(5) Å] . The average P−N distances in 4 [1.641(2) Å] and 5 [1.649(2) Å] are shorter than that of the free phosphine 3 [1.689(2) Å], indicating a more pronounced N to P hyperconjugation upon complexation of the coinage metal ions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%