Students’ implicit epistemologies when working at the intersection of engineering and the arts

Abstract

Background This paper explores the epistemologies and discourse of undergraduate students at the transdisciplinary intersection of engineering and the arts. Our research questions focus on the kinds of knowledge that students value, use, and identify within an interdisciplinary digital media program, as well as how they talk about using these epistemologies while navigating this transdisciplinary intersection. Six interviews were conducted with students pursuing a semester-long senior capstone project in the digital culture undergraduate degree program in the School of Arts, Media and Engineering at Arizona State University that emphasizes the intersection between arts, media, and engineering. Results Using deductive coding followed by discourse analysis, a variety of student epistemologies including positivism, constructionism, and pragmatism were observed. “Border epistemologies” are introduced as a way to think and/or construct knowledge with differing value across disciplines. Further, discourse analysis highlighted students’ identifications with being either an artist or an engineer and revealed linguistic choice in how students use knowledge and problem-solve in these situations. Conclusions Students in a digital media program use fluid, changing epistemological viewpoints when working on their projects, partly driven by orientations with arts and/or engineering. The findings from this study can lead to implications for the design and teaching of transdisciplinary capstones in the future.

Designing Construction 4.0 Activities for AEC Classrooms

“…The makerspace of the School of Civil Engineering became the space for tinkering and the corresponding development of such activities. Makerspaces have become increasingly common venues of STEM and STEAM education and are rapidly being incorporated into undergraduate programs [33][34][35][36][37]. These spaces give students and instructors access to advanced design technology and facilitate the incorporation of a wide variety of projects into the curriculum.…”

Engineering design learning for high school and college first-year students in a STEM battlebot design project

“…In addition to courses in higher education, STEM-based engineering curricula is promoted by many countries in K-12 education (Chien & Chu, 2018;Cruz et al, 2021) because engineering design experiences have played an increasingly substantive role in precollege students' STEM education and career preparation in recent years (Crismond & Adams, 2012). K-12 education studies have found that technology-learning activities based on engineering design enhance STEM learning (Lin et al, 2021).…”

An importance-performance analysis of teachers’ perception of STEM engineering design education

“…To cultivate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) competence, skills, and interest among students in the 21st century, governments worldwide have supported policy initiatives that promote STEM education with engineering design (ED) in secondary schools as a bridge to higher-level STEM fields (Chien and Chu, 2018 ; Cruz et al, 2021 ; Kutnick et al, 2020 ). This STEM-ED assists students in choosing future careers, motivates students to learn, and facilitates their interest in (and integration of) STEM subjects (Kwon, 2016 ).…”