1959
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1959.tb00997.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies in the Digestibility of Herbage

Abstract: Results are reported from six digestibility experiments in which frozen herbage was fed to groups of sheep at HIGH and LOW levels of intake. The sheep on the HIGH level of intake digested the dry matter, organic matter, nitrogen and normal-acid fibre in the herbage less efficiently than those on the LOW level, confirming earlier results reported in Part VI of this series. Evidence suggests that this difference results from the higher rate of passage of food through the digestive tract at the HIGH level of inta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was thought necessary because of the possible effects restriction of dry-matter intake could have on digestibility and consequently nitrogen retention (Payne, 1964;Raymond, Harris & Kemp, 1955;Raymond, Minson & Harris, 1959;Brown, 1966;Playne, 1968). The average dry-matter intakes of the rams under the different treatments are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was thought necessary because of the possible effects restriction of dry-matter intake could have on digestibility and consequently nitrogen retention (Payne, 1964;Raymond, Harris & Kemp, 1955;Raymond, Minson & Harris, 1959;Brown, 1966;Playne, 1968). The average dry-matter intakes of the rams under the different treatments are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of FL on forage digestibility has been studied extensively in the main types of forages, and the results obtained depend on the forage type (Raymond et al ., ; Demarquilly and Andrieu, ). Generally, ad libitum feeding should decrease the digestibility of the diet compared with maintenance‐level feeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x is commonly less than 3 units when 'local' equations restricted to a simple regrowth are used. Even in this case, with its apparent high precision the use of N has frequently been criticised on the following grounds: the bias introduced by differences in intake between grazing and housed animals (5,8); the fact that most faecal N is of bacterial origin (14) and as such does not necessarily hold a causal relationship to digestibility; the differences in the type of relation between N and digestibility introduced by selective grazing. These uncontrolled sources of variation have been postulated by Langland (6) to explain the differences between his results and those of Lambourne and Reardon (4) and Young and Corbett (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%