2009
DOI: 10.30539/iraqijvm.v33i1.717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the epidemiology of ringworm in cattle

Abstract: The epidemiology of ringworm in two cattle herds in Baghdad area was studied during the period fromSeptember 2001 to August 2002.Two hundred skin scraping were collected from the infected area. Theprevalence of infection was 68%. In males it was lower (37.5%) than females (62.5%) and higher in less thanone year old animals. The prevalence was highest in January (16.5%). Eleven species of fungi were diagnosed,these include; Trichophyton verrucosum, T. rubrum,T.metagrophytes, Aspergillus fumigatus , A. flavus , … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These different results could be attributed to many factors such as a seasonal variation and their effect on microbial composition, economic conditions, and disease incidence which varied from country to country. In the present study, the percentage result of Trichophyton mentagrophytes was higher than these obtained in Baghdad, Iraq by Al-Samarrae et al (25), who reported that the proportion was 5 (3.6%). These differences in the proportions of each study may result from the difference in the number of isolates enrolled in each study and the skills of laboratory investigators.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…These different results could be attributed to many factors such as a seasonal variation and their effect on microbial composition, economic conditions, and disease incidence which varied from country to country. In the present study, the percentage result of Trichophyton mentagrophytes was higher than these obtained in Baghdad, Iraq by Al-Samarrae et al (25), who reported that the proportion was 5 (3.6%). These differences in the proportions of each study may result from the difference in the number of isolates enrolled in each study and the skills of laboratory investigators.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%