2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.797.284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Cluster Magnetorheological-Chemical Mechanical Polishing Technology for the Atomic Scale Ultra-Smooth Surface Planarization of SiC

Abstract: The growth of epitaxial layer of SiC wafer requires the surface of SiC substrate to reach an atomic scale accuracy. To solve the problems of low machining efficiency and low surface accuracy in the polishing process of SiC wafer, a novel ultra-precision machining method based on the synergistic effect of chemical reaction and flexible mechanical removal of the magnetorheological (MR) effect, the MR-chemical mechanical polishing (MRCMP) is proposed. In this technique, magnetic particles, abrasives and chemical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of abrasives to material removal rate ranged from 63.41% to 91.42%, while tool pad and chemical effects ranged from 4.81% to 10.37% and 3.74% to 26.22%, respectively. Zhu et al 76 on a 6H-SiC substrate, used MR-chemical mechanical polishing (MRCMP) to achieve an atomic-scale zero-defect surface. When polished for 60 minutes, the surface roughness of SiC decreased from 50.86 nm to 0.42 nm, with material removal of the order of 98 nm/min.…”
Section: Microelectronics Component Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of abrasives to material removal rate ranged from 63.41% to 91.42%, while tool pad and chemical effects ranged from 4.81% to 10.37% and 3.74% to 26.22%, respectively. Zhu et al 76 on a 6H-SiC substrate, used MR-chemical mechanical polishing (MRCMP) to achieve an atomic-scale zero-defect surface. When polished for 60 minutes, the surface roughness of SiC decreased from 50.86 nm to 0.42 nm, with material removal of the order of 98 nm/min.…”
Section: Microelectronics Component Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, apart from the high cost of equipment, the processing efficiency of the MR polishing method is very low. In our previous work, our research group proposed a cluster MR polishing technology with 'the flexible polishing pad' formed by the cluster MR fluid [18][19][20]. Compared with the traditional MR polishing method, the surface roughness Ra of the single-crystal sapphire polished by the cluster MR polishing decreased from 1.36 nm to 0.76 nm, and the MRR increased from 4.37 to 9.53 nm min −1 [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, based on the MR finishing principle and cluster mechanism (magnetic poles arrange in a regular array), we proposed a cluster MR finishing with dynamic magnetic fields formed by multiple synchronous rotation magnetic poles. This method was applied to machine single-crystal SiC to decline their surface roughness from 50.86 nm to 0.42 nm [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%