2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2021.3122525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Qᵤ-Based Resonant Microwave Sensors and Design of 3-D-Printed Devices Dedicated to Glucose Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases, the permittivity is expressed using dielectric constant and imaginary part. The imaginary part of the complex permittivity of the material under test (MUT) can be expressed by loss tangent, which can be written as [19]: As seen in Figure 5a, the resonant frequencies for the circular and rectangular CSRR structure are 2960 MHz and 2440 MHz, respectively, which is consistent with the results of the equivalent circuit in Figure 2. The frequency shift when ε r = 90 of the circular CSRR structure is 110 MHz, and it is 80 MHz for the rectangular CSRR structure.…”
Section: Quality Factorsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In many cases, the permittivity is expressed using dielectric constant and imaginary part. The imaginary part of the complex permittivity of the material under test (MUT) can be expressed by loss tangent, which can be written as [19]: As seen in Figure 5a, the resonant frequencies for the circular and rectangular CSRR structure are 2960 MHz and 2440 MHz, respectively, which is consistent with the results of the equivalent circuit in Figure 2. The frequency shift when ε r = 90 of the circular CSRR structure is 110 MHz, and it is 80 MHz for the rectangular CSRR structure.…”
Section: Quality Factorsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In many cases, the permittivity is expressed using dielectric constant and imaginary part. The imaginary part of the complex permittivity of the material under test (MUT) can be expressed by loss tangent, which can be written as [19]:…”
Section: Quality Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For one person, nearly all values could be classified in A, whereas the results of another person with the same RNN had also values in the high risk zone D. Nevertheless, due to the small number of test persons (6), the reason for the deviation was not further investigated. In addition, resonator-based measurement systems were proposed by Jang et al [139] and Juan et al [161]. In [139], 100% of the sensor readings fell in zone A, whereas in [139] up to 93.11% were in zones A and B and 6.89% in zone D. Therefore, the results of [139] outperformed commercial sensors.…”
Section: Evaluation With Clarke Error Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%