2022
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2021.3136723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos

Abstract: Video livestreaming is gaining prevalence among video streaming services, especially for the delivery of live, high motion content such as sporting events. The quality of these livestreaming videos can be adversely affected by any of a wide variety of events, including capture artifacts, and distortions incurred during coding and transmission. High motion content can cause or exacerbate many kinds of distortion, such as motion blur and stutter. Because of this, the development of objective Video Quality Assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, it is desirable to use as many different metrics as possible when determining video quality. A detailed analysis of objective quality metric performance, performed on UHD high-motion sports footage (LIVE database), is given in [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it is desirable to use as many different metrics as possible when determining video quality. A detailed analysis of objective quality metric performance, performed on UHD high-motion sports footage (LIVE database), is given in [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various subjective quality databases exist that support studies into how the human vision system (HVS) perceives video quality. These include those developed in the context of video compression, e.g., the early VQEG FR-TV Phase I [70], LIVE VQA [71], LIVE Mobile [72], CSIQ-VQA [73], BVI-HD [74], LIVE-SJTU [75], TVG [76], CSCVQ [77] and LIVE Livestream [78]. Video quality databases also exist that support investigations into distortions due to video parameter variations (e.g, frame rate, spatial resolution and bit depth, with or without video compression artefacts), including MCL-V [79], MCML-4K-UHD [80], BVI-SR [81], BVI-HFR [81], BVI-BD [82], FRD-VQA [83], LIVE-YT-HFR [84], AVT-VQDB-UHD-1 [85] and ETRI-LIVE STSVQ [86].…”
Section: Subjective Quality Assessment For Vfimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crowdsourced databases such as Konvid [5], YT-UGC [6], and VQC [7] are typically used to design video quality metrics for user-generated content. In-lab databases such as LIVE-ETRI [8] and LIVE Livestream [9] are created for professionally created content in highly controlled settings and as a result are typically more internally consistent. However, there are very few databases that consider the effect of resolution, compression level, and frame-rate at the same time, and to the best of our knowledge there are no databases specifically targeting the low-bitrate regime for highmotion contents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%