2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Peak Current Limiting Characteristics of a Flux-lock Type SFCL with Two Magnetically Coupled Circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ [38][39][40][41] Loss Most of them have no loss during normal operation; however, inductive type SFCL has loss in normal operating condition.…”
Section: Items Superconducting Fcl Non-superconducting Fcl Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[ [38][39][40][41] Loss Most of them have no loss during normal operation; however, inductive type SFCL has loss in normal operating condition.…”
Section: Items Superconducting Fcl Non-superconducting Fcl Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among several of the SFCLs, the flux-lock type SFCL has less power burden of the high temperature superconducting (HTSC) element [53]. Short circuit current in power system can be limited with the flux-lock type fault current limiter during different contingencies [36,41,53,[84][85][86][87][88]. The configuration of the flux-lock type SFCL with over current relay is shown in the Figure 7 where N 1 , N 2 , N 3 and i 1 , i 2 , i 3 represent coil-1, coil-2 and coil-3 and their currents, respectively.…”
Section: Flux-lock Type Sfclmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, VSC-HVDC system stability has been examined with the implementation of different categories of superconducting FCLs (SFCLs) [1,9,31,32]. However, superconducting fault current limiters have several drawbacks such as big size, heavy weight and cost, magnetic field interference with nearby sensitive devices, higher leakage and circulating currents, long recovery time, and loss in stand-by mode [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] compared to non-superconducting fault current limiters. Non-superconducting variable resistive bridge type fault current limiters (VR-BFCLs) could restrict the fault current as well as improve transient stability with low cost, loss and voltage drop [24,28,41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, our study has reported on the peak current limiting characteristics by suggesting a flux-lock type SFCL that is connected in parallel and has two magnetic paths with structure of having two iron cores [10]. This had been suggested as a measure to improve the fault current limiting effect by preventing the saturation of the iron core with the increased magnetic flux in the internal iron core as the fault current greatly increases simultaneously with the occurrence of the fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%