2014
DOI: 10.7498/aps.63.110701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

study on sensitivity-related parameters of distributed feedback laser-pumped cesium atomic magnetometer

Abstract: This article reports a distributed feedback (DFB) laser-pumped cesium atomic experimental magnetometer, showing how the sensitivity is influenced by the following 5 kinds of parameters: laser light intensity, laser frequency, radiofrequency intensity, temperature of cesium absorption cell, and the pressure of the buffer gas in the cell. Results of the experiments show that each of the five parameters has some influence on the sensitivity of the magnetometer, especially the laser frequency, radiofrequency inten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, spin-exchange relaxation free (SERF) atomic magnetometers [1][2][3][4] based on the detection of Larmor precession of optically pumped atoms, [5][6][7] have approached subfemtotesla sensitivity. [8] Additionally, higher spatial resolution and non-cryogenic operation make SERF magnetometer enable new applications including the possibility of mapping non-invasively the cortical modules in the brain, [9,10] which has the potential to be an alternative of SQUID magnetometer for biomagnetism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, spin-exchange relaxation free (SERF) atomic magnetometers [1][2][3][4] based on the detection of Larmor precession of optically pumped atoms, [5][6][7] have approached subfemtotesla sensitivity. [8] Additionally, higher spatial resolution and non-cryogenic operation make SERF magnetometer enable new applications including the possibility of mapping non-invasively the cortical modules in the brain, [9,10] which has the potential to be an alternative of SQUID magnetometer for biomagnetism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] After about five decades' development, great progress has been achieved. [6][7][8] The sensitivity of OPQM was demonstrated to be 15 fT/ √ Hz in a spherical cell with a diameter of 7 cm and could reach 10 fT/ √ Hz in the limit of shot noise. [6] Based on the form of a magnetic resonance signal which is associated with the projection of the magnetic moment, general OPQMs are divided into M z magnetometer and M x magnetometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%