2016
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2016-02-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the ability to control human phantom fingers in P300 brain-computer interface

Abstract: 1Studying the ability to control human phantom fingers in P300 brain-computer interface Изучение возможности управления отдельными пальцами фантома кисти руки человека в контуре интерфейса мозг-компьютер на волне P300 В исследовании проверяли предположение, что в контуре предложенного комплекса интерфейса мозг-компьютер на основе волны Р300 (ИМК-Р300) и антропоморфного фантома кисти руки человек сможет управлять сгибанием целе-вого пальца фантома, произвольно фокусируя свое внимание на расположенном на этом па… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they generally do not report the same performance metrics used in spelling systems. Such is the case of Kaplan et al (2016), who developed a P300based BCI system to control phantom fingers using visual stimuli placed over them, as an "ideomotor training simulator." On the other hand, Giménez et al (2011) presented the electronic design of a functional electrical stimulation (FES) system and its interface with a BCI based on P300.…”
Section: Visual Brain-computer Interface For Motor Related Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, they generally do not report the same performance metrics used in spelling systems. Such is the case of Kaplan et al (2016), who developed a P300based BCI system to control phantom fingers using visual stimuli placed over them, as an "ideomotor training simulator." On the other hand, Giménez et al (2011) presented the electronic design of a functional electrical stimulation (FES) system and its interface with a BCI based on P300.…”
Section: Visual Brain-computer Interface For Motor Related Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they generally do not report the same performance metrics used in spelling systems. Such is the case of Kaplan et al (2016) , who developed a P300-based BCI system to control phantom fingers using visual stimuli placed over them, as an “ideomotor training simulator.” On the other hand, Giménez et al (2011) presented the electronic design of a functional electrical stimulation (FES) system and its interface with a BCI based on P300. However, these works focus on the integration of the BCI commands with the actuator, but there is a lack of information about the feature extraction methods, the AI-based classifiers, and the performance metrics they used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these factors make the P300 paradigm an attractive tool for creating a closed-loop BCI-based rehabilitation system with high reliability in realizing the patient’s intentions. However, P300-based BCIs have only recently been considered as a tool for motor rehabilitation ( Kaplan et al, 2016 ). So, Delijorge et al (2020) proposed using the P300-based BCI to control a hand exoskeleton, which allows users to control all exoskeleton fingers with high accuracy, while MI-based paradigms are limited in their ability to provide fine movements of finger control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%