2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-milliarcsec-scale structure of the gravitational lens B1600+434

Abstract: Abstract. In the gravitational lens system B1600+434 the brighter image, A, is known to show rapid variability which is not detected in the weaker image, B . Since correlated variability is one of the fundamental properties of gravitational lensing, it has been proposed that image A is microlensed by stars in the halo of the lensing galaxy . We present VLBA observations of B1600+434 at 15 GHz with a resolution of 0.5 milliarcsec to determine the source structure at high spatial resolution. The surface brightne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 (e.g. Koopmans et al 2000;Patnaik & Kemball 2001). Our selection algorithm found an optical counterpart to component B in SDSS DR9, the one seen very close to the lens (Jaunsen & Hjorth 1997).…”
Section: J1301+4634mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…4 (e.g. Koopmans et al 2000;Patnaik & Kemball 2001). Our selection algorithm found an optical counterpart to component B in SDSS DR9, the one seen very close to the lens (Jaunsen & Hjorth 1997).…”
Section: J1301+4634mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The relative positions of a multiply imaged system can sometimes be measured with an accuracy of a few milli-arcseconds (e.g., Patnaik & Kemball 2001) and these positions represent the most important constraints on the mass distribution of the lens. In fact, although the flux ratios of the multiple images can be easily estimated and offer another important source of information, the sensitivity of the flux measurements to details such as the dark matter substructure of the lens, the extinction in the interstellar medium of the lens, the microlensing effects of the stars present in the lens, and the time variability in the source decrease their potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the explanation of variability due to superluminal motions in the jet and microlensing should probably be verified, becausePatnaik and Kemball (2001) discussed observations which do not agree with this model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%