2020
DOI: 10.1364/oe.384259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-nanometer height sensitivity by phase shifting interference microscopy under environmental fluctuations

Abstract: Phase shifting interferometric (PSI) techniques are among the most sensitive phase measurement methods. Owing to its high sensitivity, any minute phase change caused due to environmental instability results into, inaccurate phase measurement. Consequently, a well calibrated piezo electric transducer (PZT) and highly-stable environment is mandatory for measuring accurate phase map using PSI implementation. Here, we present a new method of recording temporal phase shifted interferograms and a numerical algorithm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 b,e,h,k, respectively. Further, the effect of the coherent noise on the recovered phase images is calculated in terms of a quantitative matric called spatial phase sensitivity 12 . In order to measure the spatial phase sensitivity of the QPM system for FWL, laser, speckle field and PTLS, the standard deviation of the recovered phase maps is quantified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 b,e,h,k, respectively. Further, the effect of the coherent noise on the recovered phase images is calculated in terms of a quantitative matric called spatial phase sensitivity 12 . In order to measure the spatial phase sensitivity of the QPM system for FWL, laser, speckle field and PTLS, the standard deviation of the recovered phase maps is quantified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the spatial phase sensitivity of the QPM employed with FWL, laser, speckle fields generated by stationary diffuser and PTLS is compared. The phase sensitivity in case of PTLS is found to be comparable to the FWL source, which provides the maximum phase sensitivity in any QPM system 12 , 13 . However, the short TC length of WL/FWL confines the high-density interference fringes (required for single shot QPM) in a small FOV of the detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome the fluorophore-related downsides in nanomedicine, such as the abovementioned technological challenges, the risk of photobleaching, and the potential photo-toxicity, we focused on assessing the potential of QPM as a label-free characterization technique. As we aimed to image small liposomes (close to and below the resolution limit of light, for N3 and N4 respectively), we chose high spatial resolution over temporal resolution with on-axis microscope and phase-shifting algorithm for high-resolution and highly sensitive phase reconstruction from the recorded interferogram [ 22 , 48 , 49 ]. We achieved a successful immobilization of liposomes by pre-coating the silicon wafer support with Poly-L-Lysine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fourier transform algorithm is used to reconstruct an image from the interferogram, providing high temporal resolution at the cost of spatial resolution, due to the filtering of object information in the Fourier domain. On the contrary, interferograms from on-axis microscopes can be reconstructed through the phase-shifting algorithm, preserving high-frequency information and high spatial resolution at the cost of temporal resolution, due to their requiring of 4–5 frames per phase per image [ 22 ]. The latter setup provides lossless and highly sensitive measurements of the specimens and is thus most suited for the characterization of sub-diffraction limit-sized nanoparticles [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%