2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcortical substrates of TMS induced modulation of the cortico-cortical connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are similar to those previously described in other TMS/EEG experiments, where TMS was applied to different regions of cortex (Paus et al, 2001; Komssi et al, 2002, 2004; Bonato et al, 2006; Lioumis et al, 2009; Zanon et al, 2010; Ferreri et al, 2011; Busan et al, 2012). Consistent with previous studies, EEG deviations from pre-stimulus baseline could be induced by activation of local and remote cortical neurons and/or synchronization of ongoing activity (e.g., Paus et al, 2001; Groppa et al, 2013). Further components should not be excluded, and in particular in the time windows not considered in the present analysis, for example those between 0 and 45 ms, which were removed because the recorded potentials were still corrupted by the electric artifact induced by the strong magnetic pulse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They are similar to those previously described in other TMS/EEG experiments, where TMS was applied to different regions of cortex (Paus et al, 2001; Komssi et al, 2002, 2004; Bonato et al, 2006; Lioumis et al, 2009; Zanon et al, 2010; Ferreri et al, 2011; Busan et al, 2012). Consistent with previous studies, EEG deviations from pre-stimulus baseline could be induced by activation of local and remote cortical neurons and/or synchronization of ongoing activity (e.g., Paus et al, 2001; Groppa et al, 2013). Further components should not be excluded, and in particular in the time windows not considered in the present analysis, for example those between 0 and 45 ms, which were removed because the recorded potentials were still corrupted by the electric artifact induced by the strong magnetic pulse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although this study was performed with a figure-of-8 coil, the suggestion that hippocampal structures might be affected in the form of functional decoupling, especially with regard to the hippocampus as a key area of BDNF expression, may well explain our findings. Groppa et al [44] demonstrated in a combined neurophysiological and neuroimaging study that TMS of the primary MC modulates the contralateral thalamus and thalamocortical and transcallosal pathways, providing further evidence for the involvement of crucial brain structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) (Fuggetta et al, 2005), which lasted up to 175 ms and linearly correlated with anatomical integrity of the thalamus contralateral to the stimulation site, and of the thalamo-cortical and transcallosal fibers (Groppa et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tms-evoked Eeg Oscillations Of the Motor Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%