1985
DOI: 10.1136/adc.60.11.1072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subependymal cysts in normal neonates.

Abstract: screening. The heterozygous forms are probably not detectable during the first half of pregnancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
27
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of SEPCs varied from 1.4% to 4.4%, in accordance with several previous reports,8 24 but less than the recently published (15%) 25. The rate increased over time because of a more accurate diagnosis of SEPCs and sensibilisation of the medical staff.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The incidence of SEPCs varied from 1.4% to 4.4%, in accordance with several previous reports,8 24 but less than the recently published (15%) 25. The rate increased over time because of a more accurate diagnosis of SEPCs and sensibilisation of the medical staff.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…If SEH has occured in utero early enough to undergo complete cystic resolution, no evidence of prior SEH might be detected at the time of sonographic examination [9,11]. This might account for some of the cases with subependymal cysts and no apparent cause.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These rates are far higher than in other studies. SEP were reported in 0.5–5% of healthy term infants,2 20 21 in 3–5.23% of preterm infants2124 and in 4.1% of all admissions to a neonatal unit 25. SEP are associated with congenital infections, especially cytomegalovirus and rubella,21 23 24 2628 with many metabolic disorders, for example Zellweger syndrome, mitochondrial disorders and sulphite oxidase deficiency,29 congenital abnormalities such as cardiac defects21 30 and a host of genetic abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%