2013
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2013.797644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsidized temporary jobs: lock-in and stepping stone effects

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within a similar institutional setting in Denmark Kyyrä, Parrotta, and Rosholm (2013) find heterogeneous effects of taking up a part-time job during job search on the expected unemployment duration, for example with respect to age, sex and marital status. Fremigacci and Terracol (2013) find for a similar French program a negative lockin effect for having a subsidized temporary job during unemployment and a positive impact once the unemployed has left the part-time job on the hazard rate to employment. None of the three studies take post-unemployment outcomes into consideration.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within a similar institutional setting in Denmark Kyyrä, Parrotta, and Rosholm (2013) find heterogeneous effects of taking up a part-time job during job search on the expected unemployment duration, for example with respect to age, sex and marital status. Fremigacci and Terracol (2013) find for a similar French program a negative lockin effect for having a subsidized temporary job during unemployment and a positive impact once the unemployed has left the part-time job on the hazard rate to employment. None of the three studies take post-unemployment outcomes into consideration.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…For France, Fremigacci and Terracol (2013) find a negative lock-in effect and an increased transition rate to regular jobs once the unemployed has left the part-time job. Neither of the studies takes postunemployment outcomes into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comme Kyyrä et al [2013], Granier et Joutard [1999 D'autres études ne remettent pas en cause l'effet positif de l'activité réduite sur le retour à l'emploi, mais montrent qu'il n'est pas de même ampleur pour l'ensemble des bénéficiaires du dispositif. Par exemple, on peut voir dans le tableau récapitulatif en annexe que malgré des contextes institutionnels très divers dans ces différents pays, les effets positifs de l'activité réduiteprincipalement sur le retour en emploi mais parfois aussi sur la qualité de l'emploi recouvré -sont renforcés pour les demandeurs aux niveaux de qualification et d'employabilité les plus faibles (Caliendo et al [2016], Cocks et al [2013, Kyyrä et al [2013], Fremigacci et Terracol [2013, Gerfin et al [2005]). Toutefois, comme dans le cas français, le public exerçant une activité réduite a un niveau de diplôme et de qualification plus élevé que les autres demandeurs d'emploi (plutôt niveau intermédiaire, section 2.3), ce dispositif ne semble pas être un levier efficace pour améliorer l'insertion des peu diplômés, en raison des forts effets de sélection.…”
Section: Hétérogénéité Des Effets En Fonction Des Profils De Demandeuunclassified
“…By analysing data for young French workers at the beginning of the eighties, they found an increase in turnover without a reduction in unemployment duration. More recently, Fremigacci and Terracol (2013) considered the effect of a subsidization program for temporary jobs finding contrasting results: in particular, they found a significant lock-in effect when people work part-time, while there's a stepping stone effect when they work full-time. Again for France, Givord and Wilner (2015) found that fixed term contracts increase the likelihood to get a permanent contract, performing better than unemployment in this case, but the same does not hold for temporary agency contracts, from which it is much harder to flow into a permanent jobs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%