1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.1998.tb02074.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subsidy Removal and Farm‐Level Stewardship in Northland

Abstract: Illustrating one facet of farm‐level environmental management in post‐1984 New Zealand, this paper assesses changes in stewardship among Northland pastoralists. On‐farm activities which protect or enhance the environment continue to be undertaken without state support. However, the withdrawal of environmental grants, in tandem with the wider agricultural policy changes, has reduced the propensity and ability of farmers to undertake stewardship, especially during cyclical downturns.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies indicate that without strong and enforced regulations, or effective regulatory or market incentives, landowners are willing to retain remnant native woody vegetation if it is located on land unsuitable for pasture (Bradshaw et al, 1998;Wilson, 1992), and/or when there is significant private net benefit (Bradshaw et al, 1998;Fairweather, 1996;Mead, 1995;Rauniyar & Parker, 1998;Underwood & Ripley, 2000;Vokoun et al, 2010). The results of this study indicate many farmers do not believe woody vegetation provides sufficient benefit to offset its costs, particularly on productive pasture land.…”
Section: Are the Resulting Woody Vegetation Network Significantly Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies indicate that without strong and enforced regulations, or effective regulatory or market incentives, landowners are willing to retain remnant native woody vegetation if it is located on land unsuitable for pasture (Bradshaw et al, 1998;Wilson, 1992), and/or when there is significant private net benefit (Bradshaw et al, 1998;Fairweather, 1996;Mead, 1995;Rauniyar & Parker, 1998;Underwood & Ripley, 2000;Vokoun et al, 2010). The results of this study indicate many farmers do not believe woody vegetation provides sufficient benefit to offset its costs, particularly on productive pasture land.…”
Section: Are the Resulting Woody Vegetation Network Significantly Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gyau et al, 2014;Underwood & Ripley, 2000;Vokoun, Amacher, Sullivan, & Wear, 2010). In New Zealand, studies indicate rangeland farmers value trees for sheltering stock, and in areas unsuitable for pasture (Bradshaw, Cocklin, & Smit, 1998;Wilson, 1992). A minority of farmers also value their aesthetic services (Fairweather, 1996), and appreciate their soil conservation services (Mead, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of research on the environmental attitudes, values and practices of New Zealand farmers and other landowners (Bradshaw et al. 1998; Wilson 1992; Cocklin & Dorman 1994; Fairweather & Keating 1994; Jones et al.…”
Section: Attitudes Values and Concerns Of New Zealand Farmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly problematic given the public good nature of many acts of environmental stewardship (Pierce 1996) and the significant reliance within community‐based resource‐management systems on volunteers, who are prone to burnout (Byron and Curtis 2001). These constraints do not preclude acts of stewardship, but they do make them more difficult to undertake, especially during periods of economic decline (Bradshaw et al . 1998).…”
Section: Questioning Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%