2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subspace Clustering for Action Recognition with Covariance Representations and Temporal Pruning

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Use the roulette wheel selection method to choose a cluster as c * Recalculate the number of cluster by k = k − 1 effectiveness, we compared the proposed method with nonautomatic methods (having prior knowledge of the number of clusters) including KM (k-means), SC (spectral clustering), ENSC (elastic net subspace clustering), SSC (Sparse Subspace Clustering) [35] and GMM (Gaussian mixture model) and automatic methods including DBSCAN, MS (Mean-shift clustering), PSO [51], HPGMK [8], and MOPGMGT [36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Use the roulette wheel selection method to choose a cluster as c * Recalculate the number of cluster by k = k − 1 effectiveness, we compared the proposed method with nonautomatic methods (having prior knowledge of the number of clusters) including KM (k-means), SC (spectral clustering), ENSC (elastic net subspace clustering), SSC (Sparse Subspace Clustering) [35] and GMM (Gaussian mixture model) and automatic methods including DBSCAN, MS (Mean-shift clustering), PSO [51], HPGMK [8], and MOPGMGT [36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noisy data and outliers were not considered. Paoletti et al [35] used subspace clustering to discover human activities. To reduce the number of redundant frames, they introduced a trim method.…”
Section: Human Activity Recognition and Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stop criteria was based on the number of iteration. The performance of the proposed method was compared with the four automatic clustering including PSO [40], HPGMK [2], MOPSO (multi-objective PSO) [41], MOPGM (multi-objective PSO with Gaussian mutation) and four non-automatic clustering (with known number of clusters) algorithms contain KM (k-means), SC (spectral clustering), ENSC (elastic net subspace clustering), and SSC (Sparse Subspace Clustering) [3]. We have used KM, SC as the baseline approach and PSO, MOPSO and MOPGM have been picked for comparison because our proposed method is based on these algorithms.…”
Section: B Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent success in skeleton-based HAR, particularly by adopting deep learning methodologies, primarily relies on the supervised learning paradigm [3,31,34]. However, data annotation is expensive, time-consuming, and prone to human errors [20]. As a (recent) alternative, unsupervised approaches [7,9,12,18,22,28,30,35] are continuously reducing the performance gap with the fully supervised counterpart while dismissing the strong reliance over annotated data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%