2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-14282013005000010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substituição da fibra de vidro por fibra de bananeira em compósitos de polietileno de alta densidade: parte 1. Avaliação mecânica e térmica

Abstract: Resumo: A utilização de resíduo de fibra natural em substituição à fibra de vidro foi avaliada. Foram estudados compósitos de polietileno de alta densidade, HDPE, e fibra de bananeira com 10, 20, 30 e 40% (m/m) de fibra. Compósitos com fibra de vidro, mesma matriz polimérica e nas mesmas proporções, foram preparados para comparação. Os compósitos foram obtidos em extrusora dupla-rosca co-rotacional interpenetrante e os corpos de prova foram preparados por injeção. As propriedades mecânicas sob tração, flexão e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the tenacity thereof in relation to other composites, including composite PP+GFPP is higher, they are less rigid, as shown by the modulus of elasticity in Figure 1-b, and absorb more impact energy. Similar behavior was encountered by GOMES et al [14] comparing banana fiber with glass fiber in high density polyethylene matrix; and, SANTOS et al [12] compared curauá fiber with glass fiber in Polyamide-6 matrix. The lower modulus of elasticity was obtained by natural fiber composites without additives PP+BS and PP+CC, being the lowest result obtained by the composite PP+BS attributed to poor adhesion of the babassu fibers to the polypropylene matrix, as can be observed in Figure 3-1b, from which the fiber could be easily removed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In other words, the tenacity thereof in relation to other composites, including composite PP+GFPP is higher, they are less rigid, as shown by the modulus of elasticity in Figure 1-b, and absorb more impact energy. Similar behavior was encountered by GOMES et al [14] comparing banana fiber with glass fiber in high density polyethylene matrix; and, SANTOS et al [12] compared curauá fiber with glass fiber in Polyamide-6 matrix. The lower modulus of elasticity was obtained by natural fiber composites without additives PP+BS and PP+CC, being the lowest result obtained by the composite PP+BS attributed to poor adhesion of the babassu fibers to the polypropylene matrix, as can be observed in Figure 3-1b, from which the fiber could be easily removed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This increase in crystallinity of composites may possibly be related to the action of the fibers as nucleating agents. These agents may be particulates or fibers dispersed in the matrix, thus the large number of small crystals are formed around them 57,58 .…”
Section: Crystallinity Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of lignocellulosic fibers as reinforcement is a good alternative because of their low density compared to inorganic material, 86 low cost, abundance in nature, and renewability. Adding lignocellulosic fibers to polyethylene results in lighter parts, meaning less polymeric material can be used and giving the final product a different appearance when compared to no fiber.…”
Section: Properties Of Rotomolded Composites With Lignocellulosic Filmentioning
confidence: 99%