2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur Groups Improve the Performance of Triazole- and Triazolium-Based Interaction Units in Anion Binding

Abstract: An NMR comparative study of 1,2,3-triazole and triazolium anion recognition units containing sulfoxide, sulfone, and sulfoximine groups at C unveils an enhancement in binding ability up to ≈1 kcal/mol in acetone-d correlated with a theoretical increase of H acidity. DFT calculations provide insight into binding modes in line with experimental data for these receptors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented above show the potential of MICs derived from 1,2,3-triazoles having a chiral sulfur functional group at the C5 position. While for some applications like anion recognition the effect of the sulfur groups is to decrease the electronic density of the triazole ring, 23 the participation of these groups in determining the nature and stereochemistry of the final product is decisive. In catalytic cycloisomerization processes and cycloisomerization−dimerization processes, the role of the sulfoxide moiety is to stabilize intermediates in the catalytic cycle, allowing for the reaction to occur or significantly increasing the selectivity of the cyclization processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented above show the potential of MICs derived from 1,2,3-triazoles having a chiral sulfur functional group at the C5 position. While for some applications like anion recognition the effect of the sulfur groups is to decrease the electronic density of the triazole ring, 23 the participation of these groups in determining the nature and stereochemistry of the final product is decisive. In catalytic cycloisomerization processes and cycloisomerization−dimerization processes, the role of the sulfoxide moiety is to stabilize intermediates in the catalytic cycle, allowing for the reaction to occur or significantly increasing the selectivity of the cyclization processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent transformation of triazoles 12 into sulfoximines 15 (route d in Scheme 5) was affected by the chemoselective oxidation with m -CPBA to form the corresponding sulfonyl triazole 14 and subsequent imination 22 with PhI=NTs/Cu(OTf) 2 to form the racemic sulfoximine 15 in an excellent yield (a in Scheme 8). 23 Enantiopure sulfoximines 15 were prepared avoiding the oxidation step by the reaction of triazole sulfoxides 12 and PhI=NTs/Cu(OTf) 2 . Subsequent methylation yielded the enantiopure salts 16 (b in Scheme 8).…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,75] 4-Sulfinyl-1,2,3triazoles, which were prepared by CuAAC, displayed fluorescence and anion binding performance. [76][77]…”
Section: -Sulfanyl-123-triazoles and 4-sulfinyl-123-triazolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chiral sulfoxides and sulfoximines opened the feasibility of further application of these recognition units in donor acceptor-accept-or donor (DA-AD) recognition or enantio-discrimination of chiral anions (Scheme 7). [77] Scheme 6. Synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles Ir(III) coordination compounds.…”
Section: -Sulfinyl-123-triazolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Merging thioether with triazole in the same molecule is, in principle, an efficient strategy to combine the advances of these two fragments and could result in unprecedented molecular properties. 3 For instance, the thioether-containing bioisosteric triazole analogues of RN-18 represent a new class of potent Vif antagonists as preclinical candidates for novel AIDS therapy. 3 a Phosphorus-thioether hybrid ligands containing triazole moieties have been widely employed in many asymmetric transformations (Scheme 1a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%