2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Excluding the important synthesis costs involved, uptake of DCF here by biochar was not as efficient as for activated carbons (Bhadra et al, 2017, Bhadra et al, 2016, Sotelo et al, 2014, grape bagasse (Antunes et al, 2012) and organoclays (De Oliveira et al, 2017); but was more efficient than for molecularly imprinted polymer (Madikizela and Chimuka, 2016), sericite hybrid materials (Tiwari et al, 2015), silica-based materials (Bui andChoi, 2009, Suriyanon et al, 2013) and even some carbon nanotubes (Czech and Oleszczuk, 2016). TMP uptake by macro-algae was higher than for a powdered activated carbon (Bonvin et al, 2016), biosorbents derived from sewage sludge (Nielsen and Bandosz, 2016) and montmorillonite (Vidal et al, 2015); but lower than for certain types of activated carbon (Kim et al, 2010, Liu et al, 2012. It should however be noted that a direct comparison between biosorption…”
Section: Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Excluding the important synthesis costs involved, uptake of DCF here by biochar was not as efficient as for activated carbons (Bhadra et al, 2017, Bhadra et al, 2016, Sotelo et al, 2014, grape bagasse (Antunes et al, 2012) and organoclays (De Oliveira et al, 2017); but was more efficient than for molecularly imprinted polymer (Madikizela and Chimuka, 2016), sericite hybrid materials (Tiwari et al, 2015), silica-based materials (Bui andChoi, 2009, Suriyanon et al, 2013) and even some carbon nanotubes (Czech and Oleszczuk, 2016). TMP uptake by macro-algae was higher than for a powdered activated carbon (Bonvin et al, 2016), biosorbents derived from sewage sludge (Nielsen and Bandosz, 2016) and montmorillonite (Vidal et al, 2015); but lower than for certain types of activated carbon (Kim et al, 2010, Liu et al, 2012. It should however be noted that a direct comparison between biosorption…”
Section: Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Superfine powdered activated carbon (SPAC), which is produced by micromilling of normal powdered activated carbon (PAC), is a new option for efficiently removing natural organic matter, disinfection byproduct precursors, organic micropollutants, and taste and odor compounds from water (Bonvin et al 2016, Dunn and Knappe 2013, Heijman et al 2009, Matsui et al 2007, Matsui et al 2004, Matsui et al 2005, Wang et al 2011. SPAC offers many advantages over PAC, such as higher adsorption capacity (Ando et al 2010, Bonvin et al 2016, faster adsorption kinetics (Dudley 2012, Matsui et al 2009a, Wang et al 2011, and the ability to attenuate the buildup of transmembrane pressure when used before microfiltration (Ellerie et al 2013, Li 2014, Matsui et al 2007, Matsui et al 2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly, color removal process is applied in the textile wastewater [5][6][7][8][9] since it generates high color waste. Organics removal in the STP effluent using activated carbon adsorption has been widely applied [10][11][12][13][14][15], but study on its color removal is still slighty done [3]. Color removal process is needed to meet the requirements of water quality set by the Ministry of Health No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%