2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical carbon dioxide-based technologies for the production of drug nanoparticles/nanocrystals – A comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 635 publications
0
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further concerns exist on the potential loss of bioactivity and molecular integrity due to severe thermogenesis derived from the milling process. Other disadvantages for the top-down methods are: The lack of complete control of the morphology and crystallinity of the final product; particle aggregation/agglomeration issues; losses of the product due to drug adherence to equipment surfaces and residual presence of surfactants, solvents or stabilizers (Padrela et al, 2018).…”
Section: Nanocrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further concerns exist on the potential loss of bioactivity and molecular integrity due to severe thermogenesis derived from the milling process. Other disadvantages for the top-down methods are: The lack of complete control of the morphology and crystallinity of the final product; particle aggregation/agglomeration issues; losses of the product due to drug adherence to equipment surfaces and residual presence of surfactants, solvents or stabilizers (Padrela et al, 2018).…”
Section: Nanocrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to producing drug nanocrystals is based on supercritical carbon dioxide (ssCO 2 ). The details on the roles of ssCO 2 as solvent, co-solvent and as an additive for the production of drug nanocrystals are comprehensively reviewed elsewhere (Padrela et al, 2018). Amongst the main disadvantages of the bottom-up methods to produce drug nano-crystals are: (i) the difficulty to control the particle size, nucleation, and growth of crystals that may lead to both, undesired morphologies or amorphous crystallinities and subsequent particle agglomeration; (ii) the need for large amounts of organic solvents; (iii) finetuning solvent/antisolvent formulation is time-consuming; (iv) need for solvent removal; (v) labile drugs may denature during heating solvent removal; (vi) need for specialized equipment for ssCO 2 -based nanocrystals (Padrela et al, 2018).…”
Section: Nanocrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid expansion of the solution into an ambient environment results in the generation of nanoparticles. This method was first developed for inorganic particles before being used with pre-formed polymeric materials (Al-Kassas R. et al, 2017;Anton N. et al, 2008;Padrela L. et al, 2018;Williams H.D. et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methods Of Nanoparticle Manufacturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other physical foaming agents, carbon dioxide presents unique advantages mainly related to its safety properties (low toxicity and flammability), recyclability, and sustainability being considered a green technology [94]. The morphology of the polymer (crystalline or amorphous) determines the free volume available for the CO 2 to absorb in the polymers, affecting both the solubility and diffusivity values in the matrix [95].…”
Section: Compressed Co 2 and Supercritical Co 2 -Assisted Foamingmentioning
confidence: 99%