2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superresolution with compound Markov random fields via the variational EM algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have conducted extensive experiments with small images which permit the explicit inversion of (38) to verify the validity of this approximation, and we found out empirically that this approximation results in very close estimates and has a minor effect in the estimation process. Similar approximations have also been utilized in other Bayesian recovery methods [15], [16], [30].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Hyperparameter Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have conducted extensive experiments with small images which permit the explicit inversion of (38) to verify the validity of this approximation, and we found out empirically that this approximation results in very close estimates and has a minor effect in the estimation process. Similar approximations have also been utilized in other Bayesian recovery methods [15], [16], [30].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Hyperparameter Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The independent Gaussian model in (3) is used in most of the existing super resolution methods [8], [9], [15]- [17], [28]. Some methods utilized -norm based observation models which take both acquisition and registration noise into account [5], [6].…”
Section: A Observation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The limited accuracy inherent to HR registration from LR images is a shortcoming of this first approach. The second approach is to alternate between HR image registration and HR image estimation (see [5,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weakness of the Tikhonov prior is that it tends to destroy edges-an effect that degrades images. Therefore, the prior has captured the interest of many researchers to develop models that simultaneously suppress noise and preserve critical image features: Huber Markov random field (Huber-RMF) [27,28], edge-adaptive RMF [29,30], sparse directional [31,32], and total variation (TV) [33][34][35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%