2016
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2016.1251075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervision matters: Collegial, developmental and reflective approaches to supervision of teacher candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glickman et al (2001) also defined developmental model as "the match of initial supervisory approach with the teacher or group's developmental levels, expertise, and commitment" (p. 190). Strieker et al (2016) in their studies reported the evidences of equal engagement in directive, the collaborative, and the nondirective approach which were inherently more collegial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glickman et al (2001) also defined developmental model as "the match of initial supervisory approach with the teacher or group's developmental levels, expertise, and commitment" (p. 190). Strieker et al (2016) in their studies reported the evidences of equal engagement in directive, the collaborative, and the nondirective approach which were inherently more collegial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giving tasks, responsibilities, and autonomy to teachers can improve and develop the ability of teachers to develop the quality of the learning system in schools [17]. Collaborative and nondirective approaches play an important role in enabling teachers to demonstrate self-directed and self-regulated learning [18]. Teachers will be more effective and meaningful when studying together in a collegial study group [19,20].…”
Section: Collegial Discussion As An Instructional Supervision Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable constructs used by researchers in collegial supervision is partnership principles, co-planning, co-teaching, co-assessment, co-reflection, and closure of supervisory sessions [14]. As for teaching performance, research examines the cognitive activization, classroom management and clarity of instruction, and student support.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%